Portcaan Unipessoal LDA v. Johnson et al
| 2:2019mc00017 |
| February 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER VACATING WRIT OF GARNISHMENT by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. On May 21, 2019, the Court granted Paul A. Barreras motion to withdraw as counsel ofrecord for plaintiff PORTCAAN Unipessoal Lda. Plaintiff, as a corporate entity, was given twenty days i n which to retain new counsel or face dismissal of this action. Dkt. # 7. No appearance having been filed, the writ of garnishment issued in this matter is hereby VACATED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this miscellaneous action. (CDA) Modified on 6/13/2019 cc plaintiff via US Mail (CDA).
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER granting 5 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. Attorney Paul Andre Barrera terminated; (CDA)cc plaintiff via US Mail
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER TO ISSUE WRIT OF GARNISHMENT by Judge Robert S. Lasnik re 1 Application for Writ of Garnishment, filed by Portcaan Unipessoal LDA (CDA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Portcaan Unipessoal LDA v. Johnson et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
