United States Fire Insurance Company et al v. Icicle Seafoods Inc et al
| 2:2020cv00401 |
| July 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Contract: Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
168
ORDER granting Defendants' 163 Motion to Retax. The Clerk's Taxation of Costs, Dkt. # 162 , shall be reduced by $22,911.37. Costs are now taxed at $3,186.06. This replaces the amount taxed in the Clerk's prior Order at Dkt. # 162 . Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)
|
|
Filing
149
ORDER granting Parties' 148 Stipulated MOTION for Modification of Order for Entry of Judgment and Disbursement of Registry Funds. The clerk is authorized and directed to draw a check on the funds deposited in the registry of this court in the principal amount of $966,638.48 plus all accrued interest, minus any statutory users fees, payable to Bauer Moynihan & Johnson LLP In Trust for Insurers, and mail or deliver the check to Bauer Moynihan & Johnson LLP as counsel for the Insurers. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez.(SB) (cc: Finance)
|
|
Filing
146
ORDER re Parties' 145 Stipulated MOTION for Entry of Judgment and Disbursement of Registry Funds. The clerk is authorized and directed to draw a check on the funds deposited in the registry of this court in the principal amount of $966,63 8.48 plus all accrued interest, minus any statutory users fees, payable to United States Fire Insurance Company, et al. and mail or deliver the check to Bauer Moynihan & Johnson LLP as counsel for the Insurers. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB) (cc: finance)
|
|
Filing
144
ORDER re Parties' 74 86 111 Motions for Summary Judgment. Icicle's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Dkt. # 74 , and Insurers' Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Dkt. # 86 , are resolved as follows: Washington law appl ies to this dispute; Icicle's request for jury trial is STRICKEN; Icicle is required to demonstrate an actual loss sustained of net earnings lost during the 14-day deductible period for the 2017 cod or sockeye salmon seasons. Insurers' Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. # 111 , is GRANTED. Icicle's counterclaims are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)
|
|
Filing
136
ORDER denying Counter Claimants' 130 Motion to Amend Case Schedule and File Amended Counterclaims. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO COMPEL. Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants Insurers' Motion to Compel, Dkt. # 71 , is GRANTED. Defendants-Counterclaim Plaintiffs Icicle are ORDERED to fully and completely answer and respond to Insurers' discovery requests within 21 days from the date of this Order. Defendants-Counterclaim Plaintiffs Icicle's Motion to Compel, Dkt. # 81 , is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Within 21 days from the date of this Order, Insurers are ORDERED to ame nd their answers to RFA 32 and RFA 34 of Icicle's Third Requests for Admission to either admit or deny, and are precluded from interposing any objections in their answers. The remainder of Icicle's Motion to Compel is DENIED. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez.(PM)
|
|
Filing
126
ORDER granting parties' 125 Agreed Motion to Extend Order Setting Trial and Related Deadlines. Jury Trial is continued to 7/5/2022 at 09:00 AM before Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. Rebuttal Expert Disclosure/Reports due by 8/27/2021, Motions related to discovery due by 1/10/2022, Discovery completed by 1/10/2022, Dispositive motions due by 2/6/2022, 39.1 mediation to be completed by 5/16/2022, Motions in Limine due by 5/31/2022, Agreed Pretrial Order due by 6/15/2022, Pretrial conference to be scheduled by the Court, Voir dire/jury instructions/trial briefs due by 6/22/2022. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER denying Defendants-Counterclaim Plaintiffs Icicle's 45 Motion to Disqualify; denying as moot Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants Insurers' 60 Motion to File Supplemental Briefing. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez.(PM)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER re parties' 90 Stipulated Motion Regarding Cross-Motions for Partial Summary Judgment. Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 74 ] is re-noted for March 5, 2021. Defendants/Counterc laim Plaintiffs will file a combined Reply in Support of their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Response to Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants' Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on or before February 19, 2021. Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants will file a Reply in Support of their Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on or before Friday, March 5, 2021. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez.(PM)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER re parties' 68 Stipulation for Modification of Order Setting Trial Date and Related Dates. The Court finds good cause has been shown for modification of the Order Setting Trial Date and Related Dates, and will issue a new scheduling order. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez.(PM)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER re Parties' 58 Stipulated Motion. It is hereby ORDERED that the deadline for ESI Disclosures in the Court's order entered November 6, 2020, Dkt. No. 44 , is reset to Friday, December 11, 2020. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER denying the Insurers' 47 Motion for Leave to File Over-length Brief. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
44
AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER re Parties' 43 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER granting Insurers' 29 Motion to Deposit Funds. Insurers are hereby directed to issue a check payable to the Clerk of Court in the amount of $966,638.48. The Clerk shall deposit those funds into the Court's registry in aninterest-bearing account. No portion of those funds shall be disbursed except upon further order of this Court. Signed by Judge David W. Christel. (LH) (CC to Finance)
|
|
Filing
39
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re Parties' 38 Stipulated Motion. Signed by Judge David W. Christel. (LH)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER re Parties' 27 Stipulation. Defendants/counterclaim plaintiffs WA Vessel Company LLC, Cooke Aquaculture Pacific, LLC, and Icicle Vessel Holding, Inc. are dismissed from this case with prejudice and without any award of costs or attorneys' fees to any party. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (LH)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE AND RELATED DATES. Jury Trial is set for 9/20/2021 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 13206 before Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. Initial Disclosure Deadline is 7/14/2020, Joinder of Parties due by 9/25/2020, 39.1 mediation to be com pleted by 9/25/2020, Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 1/15/2021, Rebuttal Expert Disclosure/Reports due by 2/15/2021, Motions related to discovery due by 2/26/2021, Discovery completed by 3/31/2021, Dispositive moti ons and Daubert motions due by 4/30/2021, Motions in Limine due by 8/23/2021, Agreed Pretrial Order due by 9/8/2021, Pretrial conference to be set by the Court, Voir dire/jury instructions/trial briefs due by 9/15/2021. Signed by Judge David W. Christel. (PM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States Fire Insurance Company et al v. Icicle Seafoods Inc et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
