Harris v. New Rez LLC et al
| 2:2020cv00642 |
| May 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 32 Motion for Default Judgment; denying 33 Motion for Order to Show Cause; denying 36 Motion to cease and desist. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case and mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (LH) (cc: Plaintiff via US mail)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice. In order to avoid dismissal, Plaintiff must, within sixty (60) days of this order, provide the Court with an affidavit of service demonstrating compliance with the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 4 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis signed by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. (TH) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Harris v. New Rez LLC et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
