Federal Trade Commission v. Position Gurus LLC et al
| Federal Trade Commission |
| Position Gurus, LLC, Stacy Griego, Top Shelf Ecommerce, LLC, Aaron Poysky and Samuel Cohen Brown |
| 2:2020cv00710 |
| May 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Other Fraud |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 0045 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Stipulated MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS AND MONETARY JUDGMENTS AS TO DEFENDANTS POSITION GURUS, LLC, TOP SHELF ECOMMERCE, LLC, AARON POYSKY, STACY GRIEGO, AND SAMUEL COHEN BROWN, filed by Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Stipulated Order for Permanent Injunction and Monetary Judgement as to Defendants Position Gurus, LLC, Top Shelf Ecommerce, LLC, and Aaron Poysky, #2 Proposed Order Stipulated Order for Permanent Injunction and Monetary Relief as to Stacy Griego, #3 Proposed Order Stipulated Order for Permanent Injunction and Monetary Relief as to Samuel Cohen Brown, #4 Certificate of Service) Noting Date 5/12/2020, (Samter, Nadine) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Attorney Nadine S Samter added to party Federal Trade Commission(pty:pla), filed by Federal Trade Commission. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Samter, Nadine) (No Fee Required) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
