Carruthers et al v. i1 Sensortech Inc
| Brian Carruthers, Paul D Wember, Brent W Nelson and Bryan Carruthers |
| i1 Sensortech Inc, i1 Sensortech Inc doing business as ATHLETE INTELLIGENCE and i1 Sensortech Inc a Washington profit corporation doing business as Athlete Intelligence |
| 2:2020cv00842 |
| June 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Richard A Jones |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Plaintiffs Bryan Carruthers, Brent W Nelson, Paul D Wember re #13 Order Dismissing Case, #12 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (case) (Fain, Steffanie) |
Filing 13
ORDER OF DISMISSAL, signed by Judge Richard A. Jones. Pursuant to Plaintiffs' #12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Case, it is ordered that all of Plaintiffs Bryan Carruthers, Brent W. Nelson and Paul D. Wember's claims against Defendant i1 Sensortech, Inc. are dismissed without prejudice. (VE)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of case by Plaintiffs Bryan Carruthers, Brent W Nelson, Paul D Wember (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Fain, Steffanie) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Plaintiffs Bryan Carruthers, Brent W Nelson, Paul D Wember re #9 RAJ-Standing Order (Fain, Steffanie) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Plaintiffs Bryan Carruthers, Brent W Nelson, Paul D Wember re #6 Praecipe-Other Summons Complaint & Civil Cover Sheet (Fain, Steffanie) |
| Filing 9 STANDING ORDER for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Richard A. Jones. (VE) |
| Filing 8 CORRECTED Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) i1 Sensortech Inc (SG) |
| Filing 7 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) i1 Sensortech Inc (SG) Modified on 6/4/2020 corrected summons without header issued(SG). |
| Filing 6 PRAECIPE re #1 Complaint, to Correct Caption by Plaintiffs Brian Carruthers, Brent W Nelson, Paul D Wember (Attachments: #1 Complaint Corrected, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Corrected, #3 Summons Corrected)(Fain, Steffanie) |
| Judge Richard A. Jones added. (SG) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER re #2 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Ivan L London for Plaintiffs Brian Carruthers, Brent W Nelson, and Paul D Wember, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address/Change of Name of Attorney Susan K Kaplan. Filed by Plaintiffs Brian Carruthers, Brent W Nelson, Paul D Wember. (Kaplan, Susan) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Change of Address/Change of Name of Attorney Steffanie Moxon Fain. Filed by Plaintiffs Brian Carruthers, Brent W Nelson, Paul D Wember. (Fain, Steffanie) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Ivan L. London FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiffs Brian Carruthers, Brent W Nelson, Paul D Wember (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-6378233 (Fain, Steffanie) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Receipt # AWAWDC-6378146), filed by Brent W Nelson, Brian Carruthers, Paul D Wember. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Summons)(Fain, Steffanie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
