Gehl v. Financial Assistance Inc et al
| Victoria Gehl |
| Financial Assistance Inc and John Does 1-25 |
| 2:2020cv01057 |
| July 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| John C Coughenour |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Financial Assistance Inc (Rosenberg, Marc) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Marc Rosenberg on behalf of Defendant Financial Assistance Inc. (Rosenberg, Marc) |
Filing 3
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (GT)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant Financial Assistance Inc (CDA) |
| U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour added. (CDA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Financial Assistance Inc and John Does 1-25 with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-6452184) Attorney Michael Clark Brubaker added to party Victoria Gehl(pty:pla), filed by Victoria Gehl. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Proposed Summons)(Brubaker, Michael) Modified on 7/13/2020 to remove duplicative language and add additional defendant (KB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
