Little v. Haynes
2:2020cv01071 |
October 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 101 MINUTE ORDER: The Court requests a response to Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration, docket no. 91 . No reply shall be filed by Petitioner unless requested by the Court. Respondent is DIRECTED to file his response to the motion for reconsideration by Friday, 4/8/2022. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Nicholas Little, Prisoner ID: 383972)(MW) |
Filing 90 MINUTE ORDER striking as moot Petitioner's 89 motion for extension to file amended objections to 59 Report and Recommendation. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. **1 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Nicholas Little, Prisoner ID: 383972)(PM) |
Filing 86 ORDER ADOPTING 59 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Petition, docket no. 6 , and this action, are DISMISSED with prejudice; A certificate of appealability is DENIED as to all claims; Petitioner's motion to correct certain filing dates, dock et no. 84 , is treated as a motion for an extension and is GRANTED in part, with respect to the amended objections to the R&R (docket no. 81 ), and DENIED in part, as to the amended motion for a certificate of appealability (docket no. 82 ). Signed by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. **6 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Nicholas Little, Prisoner ID: 383972)(MW) |
Filing 77 MINUTE ORDER denying Petitioner's 75 Motion for Reconsideration. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.**2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Nicholas Little, Prisoner ID: 383972)(MW) |
Filing 73 MINUTE ORDER denying Petitioner's 67 Motion for Certificate of Appealability, denying Petitioner's 68 Motion for Sanctions. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.**1 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Nicholas Little, Prisoner ID: 383972)(MW) (cc: USCA) |
Filing 72 MINUTE ORDER denying Petitioner's 60 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.**1 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Nicholas Little, Prisoner ID: 383972)(MW) |
Filing 70 MINUTE ORDER: Petitioner's motion for an extension, docket no. 61 , to file objections to the Honorable Michelle L. Peterson's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") is GRANTED. The R&R, docket no. 59 , is hereby RENOTED to July 2, 2021. Petitioner shall file any amended objections to the R&R on or before July 2, 2021. Petitioner's motion for leave to file an overlength brief, docket no. 65 , is GRANTED. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.**1 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Nicholas Little, Prisoner ID: 383972)(MW) |
Filing 58 ORDER denying Petitioner's 43 Motion for Discovery; denying Petitioner's 44 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying Petitioner's 46 Motion for Sanctions; denying Petitioner's 55 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson.**7 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Nicholas Little, Prisoner ID: 383972)(SR) |
Filing 57 ORDER denying Petitioner's 56 Motion for Intervention Under Fed. R. Civil P. 24. Should Petitioner experience any delays in receiving materials specific to this case, and if those delays impede his ability to meet deadlines pending in this action, Petitioner may submit specific requests for relief from those deadlines. If Petitioner seeks to present a First Amendment access to courts claim to this Court, he may not do so in the instant habeas action and must instead do so by filing a separate civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Signed by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson.**2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Nicholas Little, Prisoner ID: 383972)(MW) |
Filing 48 ORDER: The Court deems it appropriate to direct the Clerk to RE-NOTE Petitioner's: (1) petition (dkt. # 24 ); (2) motion for discovery (dkt. # 43 ); (3) motion for summary judgment (dkt. # 44 ); and (4) motion for sanctions (dkt. # 46 ) a ll to be heard concurrently on February 26, 2021. Respondent may file response briefs to Petitioner's motions by February 22, 2021, and Petitioner may file reply briefs by the noting date. Signed by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Nicholas Little, Prisoner ID: 383972)(MW) |
Filing 41 ORDER granting Petitioner's 39 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply: Petitioner shall file his Reply to Respondent's Answer on or before February 11, 2021. The Clerk is directed to re-note Respondent's Answer (dkt. # 24 ) on the Court's calendar for consideration on February 11, 2021. Signed by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson.**1 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Nicholas Little, Prisoner ID: 383972)(MW) |
Filing 23 ORDER granting Respondent's 20 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: Respondent shall file his Answer to Petitioner's habeas petition on or before 12/18/2020. Signed by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson.**2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Nicholas Little, Prisoner ID: 383972)(MW) |
Filing 18 ORDER denying Petitioner's 15 Motion to Proceed Ex Parte. Signed by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson.**2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Nicholas Little, Prisoner ID: 383972)(MW) |
Filing 14 ORDER granting Respondent's 12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: Respondent shall file his Answer to Petitioner's habeas petition on or before 11/13/2020. Signed by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson.**1 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Nicholas Little, Prisoner ID: 383972)(MW) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Little v. Haynes | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.