Marra v. United States of America
| Jamison F Marra |
| United States of America Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service and United States of America |
| 2:2020cv01175 |
| August 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Tax Suits: IRS-Third Party |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7609 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. Joint Status Report due by 10/28/2020, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 10/14/2020, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 10/21/2020. (LC)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Jennifer Y Golden on behalf of Respondent United States of America. (Golden, Jennifer) |
|
Filing 3
MINUTE ORDER: The Honorable Thomas S. Zilly transfers the above captioned case as related to C20-283-RSM to the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez. All future pleadings shall bear the cause number C20-1175-RSM. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (LH)
|
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Petitioner Jamison F Marra re #1 Petition (Other) (Wenokur, Alan) |
| Judge Thomas S. Zilly added. (CDA) |
| Filing 1 PETITION to Quash or Limit IRS Summons (Receipt # AWAWDC-6505960), filed by Jamison F Marra. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wenokur, Alan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
