Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC v. ACDSee Inc
Plaintiff: Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC
Defendant: ACDSee Inc. and ACDSee Inc
Case Number: 2:2020cv01203
Filed: August 7, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Barbara J Rothstein
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STANDING ORDER FOR ALL CIVIL CASES. The procedures in this Order supplement, and in some cases, supersede the local rules. The parties are responsible for being familiar with the procedures in this Order. Failure to comply with the procedures may result in sanctions. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (GC)
September 21, 2020 Filing 14 ANSWER to #6 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC.(Ranallo, Nicholas)
September 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER re #9 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Ricardo Bonilla for Defendant ACDSee Inc, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS)
September 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER re #10 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Michael Vincent for ACDSee Inc by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(CDA)
September 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER re #8 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Neil J McNabnay for ACDSee Inc by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(CDA)
September 3, 2020 Filing 10 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Michael A. Vincent FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant ACDSee Inc (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-6575764 (Yanick, Miles)
September 3, 2020 Filing 9 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Ricardo J. Bonilla FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant ACDSee Inc (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-6575757 (Yanick, Miles)
September 3, 2020 Filing 8 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Neil J. McNabnay FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant ACDSee Inc (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-6575750 (Yanick, Miles)
September 3, 2020 Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent ACD Systems International Inc. for ACDSee Inc, ACDSee Inc. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by ACDSee Inc (Yanick, Miles)
September 3, 2020 Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with JURY DEMAND Attorney Miles Aaron Yanick added to party ACDSee Inc(pty:dft), COUNTERCLAIM against plaintiff Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC by ACDSee Inc.(Yanick, Miles)
August 24, 2020 Filing 5 SERVICE OF SUMMONS and Complaint returned executed upon defendant ACDSee Inc on 8/13/2020 (Ranallo, Nicholas)
August 10, 2020 Filing 4 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action. Emailed to the US Patent Office (CDA)
August 10, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant ACDSee Inc (CDA)
August 10, 2020 Judge Barbara J. Rothstein added. (CDA)
August 7, 2020 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Patent Asset Management LLC, Other Affiliate Leigh Rothschild for Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC (Ranallo, Nicholas)
August 7, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) ACDSee Inc. with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-6518195) Attorney Nicholas R. Ranallo added to party Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC(pty:pla), filed by Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Summons, #3 Report on Patents and Trademarks (AO Form 120), #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ranallo, Nicholas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC v. ACDSee Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ACDSee Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ACDSee Inc
Represented By: Neil J McNabnay
Represented By: Ricardo Bonilla
Represented By: Miles Aaron Yanick
Represented By: Michael Vincent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC
Represented By: Nicholas R. Ranallo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?