Davis v. Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc et al
| Brian Davis |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc and ABC Corporation 1-10 |
| 2:2020cv01263 |
| August 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Michelle L Peterson |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE AND PRETRIAL SCHEDULE by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. Jury Trial is set for 8/16/2021 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 12A before Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. Joinder of Parties due by 11/16/2020, Amended Pleadings due by 12/21/2020, Telephone Status Conference regarding Discovery set for 1/13/2021, Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 3/17/2021, Motions due by 4/1/2021, Discovery completed by 4/16/2021, Dispositive motions due by 5/17/2021, Motions in Limine due by 7/8/2021, Pretrial Order due by 7/22/2021, Rebuttal Expert Disclosure/Reports due by 4/16/2021, Trial briefs, Proposed voir dire/jury instructions due by 8/5/2021, Pretrial Conference set for 8/11/2021 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 12A before Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. (TF)
|
| Filing 12 JOINT STATUS REPORT signed by all parties. Estimated Trial Days: 4. (Tuthill-Kveton, Sarah) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT AND EARLY SETTLEMENT by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. Joint Status Report due by 10/21/2020, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 9/30/2020, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 10/14/2020. (TF)
|
| Filing 10 CONSENT by all parties to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. Case remains assigned to Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. (TF) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DECLINATION OF CONSENT FORM. Each party will be deemed to have knowingly and voluntarily consented to proceed before a Magistrate Judge if this form is not returned by 9/3/2020. Please Note: Forms must not be electronically filed with the Court. (AQ) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO FILER: re #1 Notice of Removal,. Notice of Filing Deficiency** Action Required ** See attached letter for more information and instructions. (SG) |
| Filing 7 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (SG) |
| Hon. Michelle L. Peterson added. (SG) |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (Barhoum, John) |
| Filing 5 DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Defendant Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (Tuthill-Kveton, Sarah) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Compliance with Requirement to Give Notice of Removal re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (Tuthill-Kveton, Sarah) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Adverse Parties of Removal of Federal Court re #1 Notice of Removal ; filed by Defendant Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.. (Tuthill-Kveton, Sarah) |
| Filing 2 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS re #1 Notice of Removal Tuthill-Kveton Dec ISO Notice of Removal by Defendant Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(Tuthill-Kveton, Sarah) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 20-2-05332-5; (Receipt # AWAWDC-6546080), filed by Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Tuthill-Kveton, Sarah) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/24/2020: #2 Complaint) (SG). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
