Puget Soundkeeper Alliance v. Ash Grove Cement Company
Plaintiff: Puget Soundkeeper Alliance
Defendant: Ash Grove Cement Company
Case Number: 2:2020cv01301
Filed: August 31, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: James L Robart
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33 U.S.C. ยง 1365
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 11/23/2020, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 11/2/2020, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 11/16/2020, by Judge James L. Robart. (AD)
October 7, 2020 Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, and Affirmative Defenses by Ash Grove Cement Company.(Fairwell, Valerie)
September 23, 2020 Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent CRH plc, Corporate Parent CRH Americas Materials, Inc. for Ash Grove Cement Company. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Ash Grove Cement Company (Lipsky, Joshua)
September 16, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Joshua McClain Lipsky on behalf of Defendant Ash Grove Cement Company. (Lipsky, Joshua)
September 8, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Valerie Kay Fairwell on behalf of Defendant Ash Grove Cement Company. (Fairwell, Valerie)
September 8, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Jennifer Tanya Barnett on behalf of Defendant Ash Grove Cement Company. (Barnett, Jennifer)
September 1, 2020 Filing 4 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint by Counsel David Toolan, on behalf of Ash Grove Cement Company, on 8/31/2020. (Englebrecht, Alyssa)
September 1, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant Ash Grove Cement Company. (RE)
September 1, 2020 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Puget Soundkeeper Alliance (Englebrecht, Alyssa)
September 1, 2020 NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Plaintiff Puget Soundkeeper Alliance must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 9/8/2020. (RE)
September 1, 2020 Judge James L. Robart added. (RE)
August 31, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Ash Grove Cement Company (Receipt # AWAWDC-6565411) Attorney Alyssa Lee Englebrecht added to party Puget Soundkeeper Alliance(pty:pla), filed by Puget Soundkeeper Alliance. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Englebrecht, Alyssa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Puget Soundkeeper Alliance v. Ash Grove Cement Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ash Grove Cement Company
Represented By: Jennifer Tanya Barnett
Represented By: Joshua McClain Lipsky
Represented By: Valerie Kay Fairwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Puget Soundkeeper Alliance
Represented By: Alyssa Lee Englebrecht
Represented By: Richard Adam Smith
Represented By: Meredith A Crafton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?