Streeter v. Perkins and Will Inc et al
| Douglas Streeter |
| Perkins and Will Inc, Does 1-23 and Does 1-25 |
| 2:2020cv01325 |
| September 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| John C Coughenour |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER re #8 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Kathleen M Lucas for plaintiff Douglas Streeter, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(CDA)
|
| Filing 8 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Kathleen M. Lucas FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Douglas Streeter (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-6629472 (Terrell, Beth) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE ENTRY SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT DATES All counsel and any pro se parties are directed to meet and confer and to provide the Court with a combined Joint Status Report (the Report) by the deadline set below. This meet-and-confer must be a face-to-face meeting or a telephonic conference. If the parties are unable to agree on any part of the Report, they may answer in separate paragraphs; no separate reports are to be filed. The Report must contain the following information: 1. An estimate of the number of days needed for trial; 2. The date by which the case will be ready for trial; and 3. Whether the parties intend to mediate per LCR 39.1 and, if so, when the parties expect to complete mediation.The deadlines below may be extended only by court order. Any request for extension of these deadlines should be made by email to Courtroom Deputy Clerk Gabriel Traber at gabriel_traber@wawd.uscourts.gov. The parties who have appeared in this matter must meet and confer before contacting the Court to request an extension. If this case involves claims that are exempt from the requirements of FRCP 26(a) and 26(f), please notify the Courtroom Deputy Clerk. Please note: Initial Disclosures are not to be filed. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 12/14/2020, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 12/21/2020, Joint Status Report due by 12/28/2020.(GT) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (GT)
|
| Filing 5 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (ST) |
| U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour added. (ST) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Dar Al-Handasah Consultants Shair and Partners Holdings Ltd for Perkins and Will Inc. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Perkins and Will Inc (Griffin, Michael) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Brodie Stephens re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant Perkins and Will Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Griffin, Michael) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Michael A. Griffin re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant Perkins and Will Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Griffin, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 20-2-01848-1 SEA; (Receipt # AWAWDC-6576375), filed by Perkins and Will Inc. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Griffin, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
