Sheth v. Blackbaud Inc
| Abhi Sheth |
| Blackbaud Inc |
| 2:2020cv01381 |
| September 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| John C Coughenour |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MINUTE ENTRY SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT DATES All counsel and any pro se parties are directed to meet and confer and to provide the Court with a combined Joint Status Report (the Report) by the deadline set below. This meet-and-confer must be a face-to-face meeting or a telephonic conference. If the parties are unable to agree on any part of the Report, they may answer in separate paragraphs; no separate reports are to be filed. The Report must contain the following information: 1. An estimate of the number of days needed for trial; 2. The date by which the case will be ready for trial; and 3. Whether the parties intend to mediate per LCR 39.1 and, if so, when the parties expect to complete mediation.The deadlines below may be extended only by court order. Any request for extension of these deadlines should be made by email to Courtroom Deputy Clerk Gabriel Traber at gabriel_traber@wawd.uscourts.gov. The parties who have appeared in this matter must meet and confer before contacting the Court to request an extension. If this case involves claims that are exempt from the requirements of FRCP 26(a) and 26(f), please notify the Courtroom Deputy Clerk. Please note: Initial Disclosures are not to be filed. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 2/1/2021, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 2/8/2021, Joint Status Report due by 2/16/2021. (GT) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER granting Defendant's #8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint is extended until 30 days after the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") rules on the Motion to Transfer in MDL Case No. 2972, which is currently pending before the JPML. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (LH) |
| Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Other Affiliate BlackRock Inc. for Blackbaud Inc. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Blackbaud Inc (Hernandez, Roman) |
| NOTICE of Docket Text Modification re #9 Corporate Disclosure Statement : filed without parent/affiliate, struck and refiled corrected version as docket #11 . (STP) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Roman D. Hernandez on behalf of Defendant Blackbaud Inc. (Hernandez, Roman) |
| Filing 9 DISREGARD CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Blackbaud Inc (Hernandez, Roman) Modified on 10/23/2020 filed without parent/affiliate, will refile corrected version (STP). |
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Unopposed Motion to Extend Time For Defendant Blackbaud, Inc. to Respond to Class Action Complaint, filed by Defendant Blackbaud Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 10/22/2020, (Hernandez, Roman) |
| NOTE: Documents #8 , #9 were filed incorrectly. Appearance of attorney Roman Hernandez is not proper, and notices of electronic filing will not be sent until corrected. Signatures must be in accordance with FRCP 11 and LCR 83.2(a) and must comply with #ECF Filing Procedures. (LH) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE re MDL 2972 of Response of Pam Arthur and Dorothy Kim in support of Motion for Transfer of Actions (MW) |
| Filing 6 DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Plaintiff Abhi Sheth (Lemmon, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE of Summons upon defendant Blackbaud Inc mailed on 9/22/2020 (Lemmon, Andrew) |
Filing 4
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (GT)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant Blackbaud Inc (CDA) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE TO FILER: re #1 Complaint,. Notice of Filing Deficiency** Action Required ** See attached letter for more information and instructions. (CDA) |
| U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour added. (CDA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Blackbaud, Inc. with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-6608756) Attorney Andrew Lemmon added to party Abhi Sheth(pty:pla), filed by Abhi Sheth. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Notices from YMCA and KidsQuest, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)(Lemmon, Andrew) Modified on 9/21/2020 strike jury demand (CDA). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sheth v. Blackbaud Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Blackbaud Inc | |
| Represented By: | Roman D. Hernandez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Abhi Sheth | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Lemmon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
