Khan v. ICE Field Office Director
Naeem Sohail Khan |
ICE Field Office Director |
2:2020cv01548 |
October 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Ricardo S Martinez |
Brian A Tsuchida |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 RESPONSE to #5 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Attorney Jeffrey R Meyer added to party ICE Field Office Director(pty:res) by ICE Field Office Director. Noting Date 1/4/2021 12/9/2020 , (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Removal Officer)(Meyer, Jeffrey) Modified on 12/10/2020 to correct noting date(PM). |
Noting Date Reset re #8 RESPONSE to #5 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus . Noting Date set to 1/1/2021.The matter is renoted for Jan. 1, 2020 pursuant to the order for return issued on October 26, 2020, Dkt. #7 . Any opposition that petitioner wishes to file to the United States' response is due no later than December 28, 2020. (AQ) |
Filing 7 ORDER FOR RETURN AND STATUS REPORT by Hon. Brian A. Tsuchida. Electronic posting of this Order shall effect service on the United Sates Attorney and respondent(s). Within 45 days of the date of this Order, respondent(s) shall file a return and status report. In accordance with LCR 7, respondent(s) shall note the return for consideration on the fourth Friday after it is filed. Petitioner may file and serve a response not later than the Monday immediately preceding the Friday appointed for consideration. (cc: petitioner via USPS on or about 10/26/20)(SG) |
Filing 6 SEALED DOCUMENTEXHIBIT by Petitioner Naeem Sohail Khan re #5 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (SG) |
Filing 5 2241 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Naeem Sohail Khan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Brief in Support of Petition)(SG) |
Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, signed by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. (cc: Petitioner via USPS on or about 10/26/20)(SG) |
Filing 3 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. (cc: petitioner via USPS) (ST) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge Tsuchida, filed by Naeem S Khan. (Attachments: #1 PROPOSED 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Exhibit, #3 *SEALED* Exhibit, #4 Brief in Support of Petition, #5 Prison Trust Account)(ST) (Attachment 3 has been sealed as it contains personal identifiers of minor children) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Khan v. ICE Field Office Director | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Naeem Sohail Khan | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: ICE Field Office Director | |
Represented By: | US Attorney Habeas |
Represented By: | Jeffrey R Meyer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.