Encinas v. University of Washington
Plaintiff: James Encinas
Defendant: University of Washington
Case Number: 2:2020cv01679
Filed: November 13, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
Presiding Judge: Richard A Jones
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER denying Plaintiff's #6 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge Richard A. Jones.(MW) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
December 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Three blank Summons forms mailed to Plaintiff on 12/3/2020. (ELS)
November 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 REDACTED EXHIBIT re #5 Complaint, by Plaintiff James Encinas (MW)
November 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STANDING ORDER for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Richard A. Jones. (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) (VE)
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff James Encinas. (MW)
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) University of Washington with JURY DEMAND (Summons(es) not received to issue) (Receipt # IFP Granted), filed by James Encinas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit)(MW)
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting Plaintiff's #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler.(MW) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. (cc: plaintiff via USPS) (ST) (Main Document 3 replaced on 11/19/2020 to edit the address) (RE)
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order NOTICE TO FILER re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The enclosed exhibits (Dkt. 1-8) contain personal identifiers that must be redacted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 and Local Civil Rule 5.2 and have been administratively sealed by the Court. Please file a redacted version of the documents as soon as practicable. This will not affect your original filing date. (cc: plaintiff w/docket report and named exhibits via USPS) (ST)
November 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by James Joseph Encinas. (Attachments: #1 PROPOSED Complaint, #2 Exhibit - Part One, #3 Exhibit - Part Two, #4 Exhibit - Part Three, #5 Exhibit - Part Four, #6 Exhibit - Part Five, #7 Exhibit - Part Six, SEALED #8 Exhibit - Part Seven, #9 PROPOSED Motion to Appoint Counsel, #10 Civil Cover Sheet). (Attachment #8 sealed as the exhibits contain personal identifiers.)(ST) Modified on 11/17/2020 to label Complaint as "proposed" (KB).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Encinas v. University of Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Encinas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: University of Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?