Huang v. Barr et al
| Xing Feng Huang |
| Chad F Wolf, Nathalie Asher, Warden, William Barr, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Chad Wolf and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement |
| 2:2020cv01687 |
| November 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Brian A Tsuchida |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 JUDGMENT BY COURT. The case is dismissed. (PM) |
| Filing 11 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER CONSENTING TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DISMISSING HABEAS PETITION signed by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida, #9 Stipulated Motion. (TF) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT by all parties to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. Case is assigned to Hon. Brian A. Tsuchida. (TF) |
| Filing 9 Joint Stipulated MOTION Consenting to Magistrate Judge and Dismissing Habeas Petition, filed by Respondents Nathalie Asher, William Barr, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Warden, Chad F Wolf. Noting Date 12/4/2020, (Bohl, Nickolas) |
| Filing 8 DECLARATION of Nickolas Bohl by Respondents Nathalie Asher, William Barr, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Warden, Chad F Wolf (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Bohl, Nickolas) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Nickolas Bohl on behalf of Respondents Nathalie Asher, William Barr, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Warden, Chad F Wolf. (Bohl, Nickolas) |
| Pursuant to the parties' #9 stipulation, case is reassigned to Hon. Brian A Tsuchida as presiding judge. Judge Ricardo S. Martinez no longer assigned to the case. (TF) |
Filing 6
ORDER FOR RETURN AND STATUS REPORT by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. Electronic posting of this Order, #1 2241 Petition and all supporting documents shall effect service on the United States Attorney and respondent(s). On or before December 29, 2020, respondent(s) shall file a return and status report and note it for January 22, 2021. Petitioner may file a response on or before January 19, 2021. Respondent(s) may file a reply on or before the noting date. Signed by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. (PM)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER FOR RETURN AND STATUS REPORT by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. Electronic posting of this Order, #1 2241 Petition and all supporting documents shall effect service on the United States Attorney and respondent(s). On or before December 29, 2020, respondent(s) shall file a return and status report and note it for January 22, 2021. Petitioner may file a response on or before January 23, 2021. Respondent(s) may file a reply on or before the noting date. (ST)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting Petitioner's #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The FPD is appointed to represent petitioner in this case. Signed by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. (PM) cc: Petitioner via USPS; FPD via email
|
| Filing 3 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. (cc: petitioner via USPS) (ST) |
| Judge Ricardo S. Martinez and Hon. Brian A Tsuchida added. (ST) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel , filed by Petitioner Xing Feng Huang. (Attachments: #1 Letter of FPD) Noting Date 11/17/2020, (Murphy, Gregory) Modified on 11/18/2020. Motion regenerated to AUSA. (ST) |
| Filing 1 2241 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Receipt # AWAWDC-6742737), filed by Xing Feng Huang.(Murphy, Gregory) Modified on 11/18/2020. Documents regenerated to AUSA. (ST) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
