United States of America v. $16,014 in US Currency and Any Accrued Interest
United States of America |
$16,014 in U.S. Currency and Any Accrued Interest and $16,014 in US Currency and Any Accrued Interest |
2:2020cv01750 |
November 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Richard A Jones |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE by US Marshal's Office re: Warrant of Arrest in Rem on 12/2/2020 (MW) |
Filing 5 DECLARATION of Publication (www.forfeiture.gov: December 3, 2020 to January 1, 2021) re #2 Notice-Other, #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff United States of America (Jensen, Michelle) |
Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE by US Marshal's Office re: Warrant of Arrest in Rem on 12/2/2020 (MW) |
Filing 3 WARRANT of Arrest In Rem issued (CDA)cc AUSA |
Judge Richard A. Jones added. (CDA) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem re #1 Complaint, ; filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Jensen, Michelle) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT - Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem against defendant(s) $16,014 in U.S. Currency and Any Accrued Interest, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons - Warrant of Arrest in Rem)(Jensen, Michelle) (No Fee Required) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.