Grand Ridge Plaza II LLC v. Regal Cinemas Inc
Grand Ridge Plaza II, LLC and Grand Ridge Plaza II LLC |
Regal Cinemas, Inc. and Regal Cinemas Inc |
2:2020cv01829 |
December 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
John C Coughenour |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Plaintiff Grand Ridge Plaza II LLC (Willey, Stephen) |
Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Other Affiliate Regency Centers, L.P., Other Affiliate Regency Centers Corporation for Grand Ridge Plaza II LLC. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Grand Ridge Plaza II LLC (Willey, Stephen) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ENTRY SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT DATES All counsel and any pro se parties are directed to meet and confer and to provide the Court with a combined Joint Status Report (the Report) by the deadline set below. This meet-and-confer must be a face-to-face meeting or a telephonic conference. If the parties are unable to agree on any part of the Report, they may answer in separate paragraphs; no separate reports are to be filed. The Report must contain the following information: 1. An estimate of the number of days needed for trial; 2. The date by which the case will be ready for trial; and 3. Whether the parties intend to mediate per LCR 39.1 and, if so, when the parties expect to complete mediation.The deadlines below may be extended only by court order. Any request for extension of these deadlines should be made by email to Courtroom Deputy Clerk Gabriel Traber at gabriel_traber@wawd.uscourts.gov. The parties who have appeared in this matter must meet and confer before contacting the Court to request an extension. If this case involves claims that are exempt from the requirements of FRCP 26(a) and 26(f), please notify the Courtroom Deputy Clerk. Please note: Initial Disclosures are not to be filed. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 3/22/2021, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 3/29/2021, Joint Status Report due by 4/5/2021. (GT) |
Filing 8 ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (GT) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO FILER: re #1 Notice of Removal. Notice of Filing Deficiency** Action Required ** See attached letter for more information and instructions. (CDA)ad hoc Attorney Parker |
Filing 6 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (CDA) |
U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour added. (CDA) |
NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Plaintiff must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 12/29/2020. (CDA) |
Filing 5 Defendant Regal Cinemas, Inc.'s ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal)- re: #1 Notice of Removal by Regal Cinemas, Inc.. (Ebel, David) |
Filing 4 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS by Defendant Regal Cinemas, Inc. (Ebel, David) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Cineworld Group PLC for Regal Cinemas, Inc.. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Regal Cinemas, Inc. (Ebel, David) |
Filing 2 DECLARATION of David R. Ebel re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant Regal Cinemas, Inc. (Ebel, David) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 20-2-16575-1 SEA; (Receipt # AWAWDC-6821902), filed by Regal Cinemas, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Certificate of Service)(Ebel, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.