Li v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Wen Li |
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Chad Wolf and Kenneth T Cuccinelli |
2:2020cv01842 |
December 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Barbara J Rothstein |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER granting Parties' #10 Stipulated Motion to Hold Case in Abeyance: The Court ORDERS that this action shall be held in abeyance for 75 days from the date of this Order, and the parties shall file a Joint Status Report with the Court on or before the conclusion of the 75-day period to update the Court on the status of the adjudicative process and propose a schedule for further proceedings. The Order Regarding Initial Disclosures, Joint Status Report, and Early Settlement is hereby VACATED. Dkt. #8 . Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein.(MW) |
Filing 10 Stipulated MOTION and Proposed Order Holding Case in Abeyance, filed by Defendants Kenneth T Cuccinelli, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Chad Wolf. (Strong, James) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney James C. Strong on behalf of Defendants Kenneth T Cuccinelli, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Chad Wolf. (Strong, James) |
Filing 8 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 3/5/2021, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 2/19/2021, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 2/26/2021. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (GC) |
Filing 7 STANDING ORDER FOR ALL CIVIL CASES. The procedures in this Order supplement, and in some cases, supersede the local rules. The parties are responsible for being familiar with the procedures in this Order. Failure to comply with the procedures may result in sanctions. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (GC) |
Filing 6 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Office of the Attorney General (Jeffrey Rosen, Acting AG) (Attachments: #1 Summons US Attorney's Office, Seattle)(PM) |
Filing 5 PRAECIPE TO ISSUE SUMMONS by Plaintiff Wen Li (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Weber, Cletus) |
Filing 4 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Kenneth T Cuccinelli, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Chad Wolf. (Attachments: #1 Summons-Wolf, #2 Summons-Cuccinelli)(RE) (Main Document 4 replaced on 12/29/2020 due to incorrect summons attached) (RE) |
Filing 3 ORDER re #2 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Martin J Lawler for Plaintiff Wen Li, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS) |
Judge Barbara J. Rothstein added. (RE) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Martin J. Lawler FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Wen Li (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-6828578 (Weber, Cletus) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Chad Wolf (Receipt # AWAWDC-6828546) Attorney Cletus Martin Weber added to party Wen Li(pty:pla), filed by Wen Li. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Weber, Cletus) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.