Flores v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
| Julian Flores, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Julian Sanchez Flores and Julian Flores Sanchez |
| Wells Fargo Bank NA |
| 2:2021cv00006 |
| January 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Robert S Lasnik |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
STIPULATION AND ORDER granting Parties' #12 Stipulated Motion Regarding Deadline for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., to Respond to Complaint. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW)
|
|
Filing 12
Second Stipulated MOTION re Deadline for Wells Fargo to Respond to Complaint, filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank NA. Noting Date 3/3/2021, (Talevich, Peter)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT AND EARLY SETTLEMENT Joint Status Report due by 3/23/2021, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (KERR)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER re #7 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Andrew C Glass for defendant Wells Fargo Bank NA, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(CDA)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER re #6 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Gregory Blase for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank NA, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting Parties' #5 Stipulated Motion for Wells Fargo to Respond to Complaint. Wells Fargo may have until March 5, 2021, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (LH)
|
|
Attorney Raina V Wagner added for Wells Fargo Bank NA; per #4 Notice of Appearance. (LH)
|
|
Filing 7
APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Andrew C. Glass FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank NA (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-6892316 (Talevich, Peter)
|
|
Filing 6
APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Gregory N. Blase FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank NA (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-6892304 (Talevich, Peter)
|
|
Filing 5
Stipulated MOTION re Deadline for Wells Fargo to Respond to Complaint, filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank NA. Noting Date 1/22/2021, (Talevich, Peter)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Peter Anthony Talevich on behalf of Defendant Wells Fargo Bank NA. (Talevich, Peter)
|
|
Filing 3
AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. on 1/13/2021, filed by Plaintiff Julian Flores. (Henry, Christina)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant Wells Fargo Bank NA. (RE)
|
|
Judge Robert S. Lasnik added. (RE)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Wells Fargo Bank NA Julian Flores with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-6847010), filed by Julian Flores. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)(Henry, Christina) Modified on 1/8/2021 to update party filing is against (KB).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
