Friedman v. Horizon Air Industries Inc
Matthew Friedman |
Horizon Air Industries, Inc. and Horizon Air Industries Inc |
2:2021cv00150 |
February 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Robert S Lasnik |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE AND RELATED DATES; Length of Trial: 7 days. Jury Trial is set for 3/7/2022 at 9:00 AM before Judge Robert S. Lasnik. Joinder of Parties due by 4/26/2021, Amended Pleadings due by 9/8/2021, Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 9/8/2021, Discovery completed by 11/7/2021, Attorney settlement conference to be held by 11/21/2021, Dispositive motions due by 12/7/2021, Motions in Limine due by 2/7/2022, Pretrial Order due by 2/23/2022, Trial briefs to be submitted by 3/2/2022, Proposed voir dire/jury instructions and trial exhibits due by 3/2/2022 (KERR) |
Filing 14 JOINT STATUS REPORT signed by all parties. Estimated Trial Days: 7. (Gabel, Molly) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint; by Horizon Air Industries Inc.(Gabel, Molly) |
Filing 12 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT AND EARLY SETTLEMENT Joint Status Report due by 3/18/2021, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (KERR) |
Filing 11 ORDER re #10 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Hoorya Ahmad for Defendant Horizon Air Industries Inc, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS) |
Filing 10 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Hoorya Ahmad FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant Horizon Air Industries Inc (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-6943825 (Gabel, Molly) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting Parties' #8 Stipulated Motion for an Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. The answer is now due by February 19, 2021. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (LH) |
Filing 8 Stipulated MOTION , filed by Defendant Horizon Air Industries Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 2/12/2021, (Gabel, Molly) |
Filing 7 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (RE) |
Filing 6 DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Plaintiff Matthew Friedman (Fomina, Vera) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER: Notice of Filing Deficiency** Action Required ** See attached letter for more information and instructions. (RE) (Main Document 5 replaced on 2/8/2021 to edit letter) (RE) |
Judge Robert S. Lasnik added. (RE) |
Filing 4 NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal ; filed by Defendant Horizon Air Industries, Inc.. (Gabel, Molly) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Horizon Air Industries, Inc. (Gabel, Molly) |
Filing 2 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant Horizon Air Industries, Inc. (Gabel, Molly) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King, case number 21-2-00391-1-SEA; (Receipt # AWAWDC-6924401), filed by Horizon Air Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Complaint , #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Certificate of Service)(Gabel, Molly) Modified on 2/8/2021 to add document titles. (RE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.