Nelson v. Galvan et al
| Richard Dewayne Nelson |
| Ramona C Brandes, Daniel T Satterberg, Veronica Alicea Galvan and Richard Kim |
| 2:2021cv00195 |
| February 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Richard A Jones |
| Mary Alice Theiler |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 LETTER re #3 Order, filed by Richard Dewayne Nelson. (ST) |
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #4 1983 Complaint by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. Show Cause Response due by 4/9/2021. (cc: plaintiff via USPS)(ST)
|
| Filing 4 1983 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT, filed by Richard Dewayne Nelson against defendant(s) Ramona C Brandes, Veronica Alicea Galvan, Richard Kim, Daniel T Satterberg with JURY DEMAND. (ST) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #1 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. (cc: plaintiff; King County Regional Justice Center via USPS) (ST)
|
| Filing 2 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. (cc: plaintiff via USPS) (ST) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge Theiler, filed by Richard Dewayne Nelson. (Attachments: #1 PROPOSED 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, #2 Prison Trust Account)(ST) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
