Tagg v. United Parcel Service et al
Plaintiff: Shallon Tagg
Defendant: United Parcel Service and Derek Pedersen
Case Number: 2:2021cv00307
Filed: March 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: John C Coughenour
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2021 Filing 13 RECEIPT re #12 Remand Letter to State Court. (MW)
March 16, 2021 NOTE: Document #10 was filed incorrectly. Appearance of attorney Portia R. Moore is not proper, and notices of electronic filing will not be sent until corrected. Signatures must be in accordance with FRCP 11 and LCR 83.2(a) and must comply with #ECF Filing Procedures. (SR)
March 11, 2021 Filing 12 LETTER to King County Superior Court Remanding Case to State Court (LH) (cc: letter, docket, and remand order to King County Superior Court via US mail)
March 11, 2021 Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER: This matter comes before the Court on the parties' stipulated motion to remand the case to King County Superior Court (Dkt. No. #10 ). The Court GRANTS the motion. It is hereby ORDERED that this case be remanded to King County Superior Court under Case No. 20-2-10616-0. The Clerk is respectfully DIRECTED to close this case. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (LH)
March 10, 2021 Filing 10 Stipulated MOTION and Proposed Order to Withdraw Notice of Removal, filed by Defendant United Parcel Service. Noting Date 3/10/2021, (Shelton, Anna)
March 10, 2021 Filing 9 MINUTE ENTRY SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT DATES All counsel and any pro se parties are directed to meet and confer and to provide the Court with a combined Joint Status Report (the Report) by the deadline set below. This meet-and-confer must be a face-to-face meeting or a telephonic conference. If the parties are unable to agree on any part of the Report, they may answer in separate paragraphs; no separate reports are to be filed. The Report must contain the following information: 1. An estimate of the number of days needed for trial; 2. The date by which the case will be ready for trial; and 3. Whether the parties intend to mediate per LCR 39.1 and, if so, when the parties expect to complete mediation.The deadlines below may be extended only by court order. Any request for extension of these deadlines should be made by email to Courtroom Deputy Clerk Gabriel Traber at gabriel_traber@wawd.uscourts.gov. The parties who have appeared in this matter must meet and confer before contacting the Court to request an extension. If this case involves claims that are exempt from the requirements of FRCP 26(a) and 26(f), please notify the Courtroom Deputy Clerk. Please note: Initial Disclosures are not to be filed. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 6/14/2021, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 6/21/2021, Joint Status Report due by 6/28/2021. (GT)
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (GT)
March 9, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE TO FILER: re #1 Notice of Removal,. Notice of Filing Deficiency** Action Required ** See attached letter for more information and instructions. (SG)
March 9, 2021 Filing 6 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (SG)
March 9, 2021 U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour added. (SG)
March 8, 2021 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Defendant United Parcel Service re #3 Certificate-Other, #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #4 Verification of State Court Records, #1 Notice of Removal, (Shelton, Anna)
March 8, 2021 Filing 4 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS re #1 Notice of Removal, by Defendant United Parcel Service (Shelton, Anna)
March 8, 2021 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Filing Notice of Removal in Superior Court re #1 Notice of Removal, by Defendant United Parcel Service (Shelton, Anna)
March 8, 2021 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by United Parcel Service (Shelton, Anna)
March 8, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 20-2-10616-0; (Receipt # AWAWDC-6990597), filed by United Parcel Service. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 State Court Records (Except Complaint), #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Shelton, Anna)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tagg v. United Parcel Service et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shallon Tagg
Represented By: Martin D McLean
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Parcel Service
Represented By: Anna Rebecca Shelton
Represented By: Portia R Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Derek Pedersen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?