Carney v. State of Washington et al
| Mary M Carney |
| State of Washington, Swinomish Indian Tribal Community and Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission |
| 2:2021cv00415 |
| March 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Marsha J Pechman |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 33
RESPONSE, by Defendant Swinomish Indian Tribal Community, to #21 MOTION to Remand to State Court. (Golding, Wyatt)
|
|
Filing 32
RESPONSE, by Defendant Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission, to #21 MOTION to Remand to State Court. (Heidinger, John)
|
|
Filing 31
MINUTE ORDER: Plaintiff Mary Carney has filed a motion to remand for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, noted for May 28. (Dkt. Nos. #21 , #22 .) The #10 motion to dismiss is renoted to May 28, as the Court must first ascertain jurisdiction. Authorized by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (LH)
|
|
Filing 30
Second DECLARATION of Karen Mitchell, MS, LG filed by Defendant Swinomish Indian Tribal Community re #10 MOTION to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Slonim, Marc)
|
|
Filing 29
DECLARATION of Todd Mitchell, MS filed by Defendant Swinomish Indian Tribal Community re #10 MOTION to Dismiss (Slonim, Marc)
|
|
Filing 28
REPLY, filed by Defendant Swinomish Indian Tribal Community, TO RESPONSE to #10 MOTION to Dismiss (Slonim, Marc)
|
|
Filing 27
PRAECIPE to attach document re #23 Response to Motion by Plaintiff Mary M Carney (Attachments: #1 Updated Opposition to Motion to Dismiss)(Gellert, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing 26
NOTICE of Association of Attorney by John Heidinger on behalf of Defendant Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission. (Heidinger, John)
|
|
Filing 25
DECLARATION of Jennifer A. MacLean filed by Plaintiff Mary M Carney re #10 MOTION to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit Exhibit O)(Gellert, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing 24
DECLARATION of Walter F. Crampton filed by Plaintiff Mary M Carney re #10 MOTION to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 6)(Gellert, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing 23
RESPONSE, by Plaintiff Mary M Carney, to #10 MOTION to Dismiss . Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gellert, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing 22
DECLARATION of Jennifer A. MacLean filed by Plaintiff Mary M Carney re #21 MOTION to Remand to State Court (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E)(Gellert, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing 21
MOTION to Remand to State Court, filed by Plaintiff Mary M Carney. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 5/28/2021, (Gellert, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing 20
NOTICE that the following is RE-NOTED: #10 MOTION to Dismiss . Filed by Defendant Swinomish Indian Tribal Community. Noting Date 5/7/2021, (Golding, Wyatt)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #18 Motion for Leave to File an Over-Length Brief in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Remand. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (SR)
|
|
Filing 18
MOTION for Leave to an File Over-Length Brief in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Remand, filed by Plaintiff Mary M Carney. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 4/19/2021, (Gellert, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing 17
DECLARATION of Andy Woo filed by Defendants State of Washington, Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission re #10 MOTION to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Woo, Andy)
|
|
Filing 16
RESPONSE, by Defendants State of Washington, Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission, to #10 MOTION to Dismiss . Oral Argument Requested. (Woo, Andy)
|
|
Filing 15
NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Weston LeMay on behalf of Defendant Swinomish Indian Tribal Community. (LeMay, Weston)
|
|
Filing 14
VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS by Defendant Swinomish Indian Tribal Community (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Golding, Wyatt)
|
|
Filing 13
DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Plaintiff Mary M Carney (Gellert, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing 12
DECLARATION of Emily Haley filed by Defendant Swinomish Indian Tribal Community re #10 MOTION to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-40)(Haley, Emily)
|
|
Filing 11
DECLARATION of Karen Mitchell, MS, LG filed by Defendant Swinomish Indian Tribal Community re #10 MOTION to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6)(Haley, Emily)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Defendant Swinomish Indian Tribal Community. Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 5/28/2021 4/30/2021, (Haley, Emily) Modified to re-note on 5/18/2021 (LH).
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER re #3 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Odin Alonso Smith for Plaintiff Mary M Carney, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Wyatt Foster Golding on behalf of Defendant Swinomish Indian Tribal Community. (Golding, Wyatt)
|
|
Filing 7
Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Notice of Removal,. ***Action Required*** Improper Signature - Secondary Attorney(s).See attached letter for more information and instructions. (RE) (Main Document 7 replaced on 3/31/2021 to add additional attorney) (RE)
|
|
Filing 6
LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from Skagit County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (RE)
|
|
Filing 5
Notice of Filing Deficiency ***Action Required*** Attorney Admission.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (RE)
|
|
Judge Marsha J. Pechman added. (RE)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER re #2 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Jennifer A Maclean for Plaintiff Mary M Carney, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS)
|
|
Filing 3
APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Odin A. Smith FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Mary M Carney (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7017480 (Gellert, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing 2
APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Jennifer A. MacLean FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Mary M Carney (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7017429 (Gellert, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Skagit County Superior Court, case number 21-2-00126-29; (Receipt # AWAWDC-7016049) Attorney Wyatt Foster Golding added to party Swinomish Indian Tribal Community(pty:dft), filed by Swinomish Indian Tribal Community. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Amended Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Golding, Wyatt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
