Berall v. Verathon Inc et al
| Jonathan Berall |
| Hoya Digital Solutions Corp, Verathon Inc, Hoya Corp, Pentax of America Inc and LMA North America Inc |
| Brenda Murphy |
| 2:2021cv00501 |
| April 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Richard A Jones |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 DECLARATION of John Patrick Bailey filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Berall re #6 MOTION to Transfer Case (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Bailey, John) |
| Filing 23 REPLY, filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Berall, TO RESPONSE to #6 MOTION to Transfer Case (Bailey, John) |
| Filing 22 REPLY, filed by Defendant Verathon Inc, TO RESPONSE to #1 MOTION to Quash (Holt, Thomas) |
| Filing 21 DECLARATION of John Patrick Bailey filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Berall re #1 MOTION to Quash (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H)(Bailey, John) |
| Filing 20 RESPONSE, by Plaintiff Jonathan Berall, to #1 MOTION to Quash. Oral Argument Requested. (Bailey, John) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Joseph Douglas Gehrke on behalf of In Re Brenda Murphy. (Gehrke, Joseph) |
| Filing 18 LETTER from Seth Rosenburg re #1 MOTION to Quash filed by Brenda Murphy (Rosenberg, Seth) |
| Filing 17 DECLARATION of Seth Rosenburg filed by In Re Brenda Murphy re #1 MOTION to Quash (Rosenberg, Seth) |
| Filing 16 DECLARATION of Brenda Murphy filed by In Re Brenda Murphy re #1 MOTION to Quash (Rosenberg, Seth) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE, by In Re Brenda Murphy, to #1 MOTION to Quash. (Rosenberg, Seth) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Seth Alan Rosenberg on behalf of In Re Brenda Murphy. (Rosenberg, Seth) |
Filing 13
ORDER by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. On April 1, 2021, Verathon Inc. filed a motion for protective order and to quash subpoenas issued to third-party Brenda Murphy. The plaintiff in the underlying matter, Jonathan Berall, filed a motion to transfer and a motion to stay, requests that Verathon has now opposed. In light of the contested nature of this proceeding, the Clerk of Court is directed to assign a civil action number. (CDA)
|
| MINUTE ENTRY: Pursuant to objections filed in case number 2:21-mc-00043 RSL, and the Court's order to assign a civil case number, the case has been randomly assigned to Hon. Richard A Jones, case number 2:21-cv-00501. All future pleadings must now bear the newly assigned case number. (CDA) |
| NOTICE of Docket Text Modification re #8 MOTION to Stay re #1 MOTION to Quash : Corrected title of Motion to Stay to include "Ex-Parte" (CDA) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE, by Defendant Verathon Inc, to #6 MOTION to Transfer Case . (Holt, Thomas) |
| Filing 11 LETTER from Damond Mace re #8 MOTION to Stay re #1 MOTION to Quash and requesting telephone conference filed by Verathon Inc (Holt, Thomas) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE, by Defendant Verathon Inc, to #8 MOTION to Stay re #1 MOTION to Quash . (Holt, Thomas) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER re #4 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Damond Mace for Defendant Verathon Inc, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS)
|
| Filing 8 EX-PARTE MOTION to Stay re #1 MOTION to Quash , filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Berall. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 4/12/2021, (Bailey, John) Modified on 4/14/2021 corrected title of document (CDA). |
| Filing 7 DECLARATION of John Patrick Bailey filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Berall re #6 MOTION to Transfer Case (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13)(Bailey, John) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Transfer Case , filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Berall. Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 5/7/2021, (Bailey, John) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney John P Bailey on behalf of Plaintiff Jonathan Berall. (Bailey, John) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Damond Mace FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant Verathon Inc (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7037365 (Holt, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Defendant Verathon Inc re #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #1 MOTION to Quash (Holt, Thomas) |
| Miscellaneous Case Filing Fee payment receipt number AWAWDC-7029868 (Holt, Thomas) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Roper Technologies Inc for Verathon Inc. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Verathon Inc (CDA) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Protective Order and to Quash Subpoeanas Issued to Brenda Murphy, filed by Defendant Verathon Inc. Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David Potter, #2 Exhibits A-K re Declaration of David Potter, #3 Declaration of Earl Thompson, #4 Exhibits A-B re Declaration of Earl Thompson, #5 Declaration of Reza Ahmadian Yazdi, #6 Declaration of Damon Mace, #7 Exhibit A re Declaration of Damon Mace, #8 PROPOSED Order, #9 Civil Cover Sheet, #10 Email transmittal) Noting Date 4/16/2021 (per filing), (CDA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
