Kalkbrenner v. Professional Bull Riders LLC
Tracie Kalkbrennar and Tracie Kalkbrenner |
Professional Bull Riders LLC |
2:2021cv00633 |
May 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Ricardo S Martinez |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. Joint Status Report due by 7/2/2021, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 6/18/2021, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 6/25/2021. (LC) |
Filing 4 PRAECIPE to attach document (Civil Cover Sheet) re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Tracie Kalkbrennar (Kalish, Daniel) |
Filing 3 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant Professional Bull Riders LLC. (RE) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing Deficiency ***Action Required*** Document Incomplete.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (RE) |
Judge Ricardo S. Martinez added. (RE) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Professional Bull Riders LLC with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # BWAWDC-7082122) Attorney Daniel Kalish added to party Tracie Kalkbrennar(pty:pla), filed by Tracie Kalkbrennar. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Kalish, Daniel) (Attachment 1 replaced on 5/13/2021 to flatten malformed PDF. Note - document was filed blank) (KB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.