Waste Action Project v. Ply Gem Pacific Windows Corporation
| Waste Action Project |
| Ply Gem Pacific Windows Corporation |
| 2:2021cv00827 |
| June 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Barbara J Rothstein |
| Environmental Matters |
| 33 U.S.C. ยง 1365 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER: At the request of the parties, the Court hereby amends its scheduling order (Dkt. #6 ) and extends the deadline for initial disclosures to September 13, 2021. All other deadlines remain in place. Authorized by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (LH)
|
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER FOR ALL CIVIL CASES. The procedures in this Order supplement, and in some cases, supersede the local rules. The parties are responsible for being familiar with the procedures in this Order. Failure to comply with the procedures may result in sanctions. This entry is to fix the error in dkt. #4 which did not send out notice to the parties.Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (GC)
|
| Attorney Mark McLean Myers added for Ply Gem Pacific Windows Corporation; per #5 Notice of Appearance. (SR) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 8/20/2021, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 8/6/2021, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 8/13/2021. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (GC)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Bridget T Schuster on behalf of Defendant Ply Gem Pacific Windows Corporation. (Schuster, Bridget) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER FOR ALL CIVIL CASES. The procedures in this Order supplement, and in some cases, supersede the local rules. The parties are responsible for being familiar with the procedures in this Order. Failure to comply with the procedures may result in sanctions. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (GC)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant Ply Gem Pacific Windows Corporation. (RE) |
| Judge Barbara J. Rothstein added. (RE) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Waste Action Project (Koepfgen, Alyssa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Ply Gem Pacific Windows Corporation (Receipt # AWAWDC-7133980), filed by Waste Action Project. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Koepfgen, Alyssa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Waste Action Project v. Ply Gem Pacific Windows Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ply Gem Pacific Windows Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Bridget T Schuster |
| Represented By: | Mark McLean Myers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Waste Action Project | |
| Represented By: | Richard Adam Smith |
| Represented By: | Alyssa Lee Koepfgen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
