Hughes v. DeJoy
| Michael Hughes |
| US POSTAL SERVICE and Louis DeJoy |
| 2:2021cv00906 |
| July 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Robert S Lasnik |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Mailing of Summons and Complaint to Louis DeJoy on 7/13/2021, filed by Plaintiff Michael Hughes. (Mann, Mary) |
| Filing 5 PRAECIPE re #1 Complaint, #2 Praecipe for a Summons Civil Case Sheet by Plaintiff Michael Hughes (Mann, Mary) Modified to strike through non-applicable text on 7/9/2021 (LH). |
| Filing 4 Notice of Filing Deficiency ***Action Required*** Improper Signature - Secondary Attorney, Civil Cover Sheet Omitted.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (RE) |
| Filing 3 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General. (RE) |
| Filing 2 PRAECIPE TO ISSUE SUMMONS re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Michael Hughes (Mann, Mary) |
| Judge Robert S. Lasnik added. (RE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Michael Hughes Louis DeJoy with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-7153867) Attorney Mary R Mann added to party Michael Hughes(pty:pla), filed by Michael Hughes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Mann, Mary) Modified on 7/7/2021 to correct party filing is against (KB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
