Watermark Cove Condominium Association v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company et al
| Watermark Cove Condominium Association |
| Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company and Doe Insurance Companies 1-10 |
| 2:2021cv00913 |
| July 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Thomas S Zilly |
| Insurance |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 635 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Watermark Cove Condominium Association (Stein, Daniel) |
| NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Plaintiff(s) must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 7/20/2021. (MET) |
Filing 3
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Joint Status Report due by 9/10/2021, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 8/27/2021, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 9/10/2021. (SRS)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company (SG) |
| Judge Thomas S. Zilly added. (SG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-7157683), filed by Watermark Cove Condominium Association. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Stein, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
