Northwest Administrators Inc v. Certainteed Gypsum Manufacturing Inc
| Northwest Administrators, Inc. and Northwest Administrators Inc |
| Certainteed Gypsum Manufacturing, Inc. and Certainteed Gypsum Manufacturing Inc |
| 2:2021cv00994 |
| July 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Barbara J Rothstein |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Based on the foregoing Stipulation of Plaintiff and Defendant, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this action shall be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice and that each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs of suit. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (MW)
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER for Dismissal with Prejudice by parties (Reid, Russell) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement by Defendant Certainteed Gypsum Manufacturing Inc (Buhite, Russell) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 9/28/2021, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 9/14/2021, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 9/21/2021. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (GC)
|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) re: #1 Notice of Removal . by Certainteed Gypsum Manufacturing Inc.(Buhite, Russell) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting Parties' #6 Stipulated Motion to Extend Time. Certainteed is allowed an additional fourteen (14) days, to and including August 13, 2021 to answer, present defenses, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein.(MW)
|
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Saint-Gobain Corporation for Certainteed Gypsum Manufacturing Inc. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Certainteed Gypsum Manufacturing Inc (Buhite, Russell) |
| Filing 6 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time, filed by Defendant Certainteed Gypsum Manufacturing Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Buhite, Russell) |
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER FOR ALL CIVIL CASES. The procedures in this Order supplement, and in some cases, supersede the local rules. The parties are responsible for being familiar with the procedures in this Order. Failure to comply with the procedures may result in sanctions. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (GC)
|
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Northwest Administrators Inc (Reid, Russell) |
| Filing 3 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (CDA) |
| Judge Barbara J. Rothstein added. (CDA) |
| NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Plaintiff and Defendant must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 8/3/2021. (CDA) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Russell S. Buhite re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant Certainteed Gypsum Manufacturing, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8)(Buhite, Russell) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 21-2-08525-0 SEA; (Receipt # AWAWDC-7182149), filed by Certainteed Gypsum Manufacturing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (Complaint), #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Buhite, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
