Clement v. Accounts Receivable Inc et al
| Ashley A Clement |
| Accounts Receivable Inc, Rachel F Niten and Andrew Roskam |
| 2:2021cv01023 |
| August 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Barbara J Rothstein |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1692 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 DECLARATION of Timothy J. Fransen filed by Defendants Accounts Receivable Inc, Andrew Roskam re #16 MOTION to Dismiss State Law Causes of Action - Leaving Federal Claims for Adjudication (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Fransen, Timothy) |
| Filing 25 RESPONSE, by Defendants Accounts Receivable Inc, Andrew Roskam, to #16 MOTION to Dismiss State Law Causes of Action - Leaving Federal Claims for Adjudication. (Fransen, Timothy) |
| Filing 24 JOINT STATUS REPORT signed by all parties. Estimated Trial Days: 3. Filed by Plaintiff Ashley A Clement.(Mitchell, Robert) |
| Filing 23 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Accounts Receivable Inc, Andrew Roskam (Fransen, Timothy) |
Filing 22
ORDER denying #17 Motion for Default. The Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion for default (Dkt. No. #17 ). Plaintiff's motion fails to comply with the provisions of the Court's Standing Order for All Civil Cases (Dkt. No. #4 ) and with the provisions of Local Civil Rule 55. Authorized by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein.(GC)
|
| MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to the Standing Order for Civil Cases Setting Trial Date, Related Dates, and Court Procedures ("Standing Order") [Dkt. No. #4 ], the Court HEREBY STRIKES the noting date for the Plaintiff's motion to dismiss [Dkt. No. #21 ]. Instead, pursuant to Section II.A. 3 of the Standing Order, the opposition to the motion is due twenty-one (21) days after the date on which the motion was filed and the reply is due fourteen (14) days after the opposition is filed. This Minute Order does not strike the motion; rather, it strikes the noting date. The Court will consider the motion upon the completion of briefing in accordance with the foregoing schedule. In the future, the Court expects the parties to comply with the terms of the Standing Order. (MW) |
| Filing 21 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Affirmative Defense, filed by Plaintiff Ashley A Clement. Noting Date 10/22/2021, (Mitchell, Robert) Modified on 9/22/2021 (MW). |
| Filing 20 DECLARATION of Timothy J. Fransen filed by Defendants Accounts Receivable Inc, Andrew Roskam re #17 MOTION for Default against Accounts Receivable Inc, and Andrew Roskam, (Fransen, Timothy) |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE, by Defendants Accounts Receivable Inc, Andrew Roskam, to #17 MOTION for Default against Accounts Receivable Inc, and Andrew Roskam,. (Fransen, Timothy) |
| Filing 18 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, and Affirmative Defenses by Accounts Receivable Inc, Andrew Roskam.(Fransen, Timothy) |
| Filing 17 MOTION for Default against Accounts Receivable Inc, and Andrew Roskam,, filed by Plaintiff Ashley A Clement. Noting Date 9/21/2021, (Mitchell, Robert) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss State Law Causes of Action - Leaving Federal Claims for Adjudication, filed by Plaintiff Ashley A Clement. Noting Date 9/8/2021, (Mitchell, Robert) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 10/15/2021, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 10/1/2021, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 10/8/2021. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (GC)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER re Plaintiff's #10 Motion to Dismiss Defendant Rachel F. Niten. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion and ORDERS that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Rachel F. Niten are DISMISSED without prejudice and without an award of costs or fees to either party. Defendant Niten is dismissed as a party to this action. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (PM)
|
| NOTICE of Docket Text Modification re #13 Notice of Filing Deficiency. Clerk struck through entry as entered in error. Mr. Timothy J. Fransen is admitted to practice in the WDWA and has been added to the docket. (PM) |
| Attorney Timothy J. Fransen added as counsel for Accounts Receivable Inc, Rachel F Niten, and Andrew Roskam per #12 Notice of Appearance. (PM) |
| Filing 13 ***DISRGARD. ENTERED IN ERROR*** Notice of Filing Deficiency re #12 Notice of Appearance. ***Action Required*** Attorney Admission.See attached letter for more information and instructions (SR) Modified on 8/16/2021 (PM). |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Robert E Sabido on behalf of Defendants Accounts Receivable Inc, Rachel F Niten, Andrew Roskam. (Sabido, Robert) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to the Standing Order for Civil Cases Setting Trial Date, Related Dates, and Court Procedures (Standing Order) [Dkt. No. #4 ], the Court HEREBY STRIKES the noting date for the motion to dismiss party [Dkt. No. #10 ]. Instead, pursuant to Section II.A. 3 of the Standing Order, the opposition to the motion is due twenty-one (21) days after the date on which the motion was filed and the reply is due fourteen (14) days after the opposition is filed. This Minute Order does not strike the motion; rather, it strikes the noting date. The Court will consider the motion upon the completion of briefing in accordance with the foregoing schedule. In the future, the Court expects the parties to comply with the terms of the Standing Order. Authorized by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (SR)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss Party Defendant RACHEL F. NITEN, filed by Plaintiff Ashley A Clement. Noting Date 8/13/2021, (Mitchell, Robert) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE of Summons upon defendant Rachel F Niten mailed on 8/2/2021 8/12/2021 (Sabido, Robert) Modified on 8/13/2021 to correct date waiver was mailed. (SR) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE of Summons upon defendant Andrew Roskam mailed on 8/2/2021 8/12/2021 (Sabido, Robert) Modified on 8/13/2021 to correct date waiver was mailed. (SR) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE of Summons upon defendant Accounts Receivable Inc mailed on 8/2/2021 8/12/2021 (Sabido, Robert) Modified on 8/13/2021 to correct date waiver was mailed. (SR) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Andrew Roskam on 8/12/2021, filed by Plaintiff Ashley A Clement. (Mitchell, Robert) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Accounts Receivable Inc. on 8/12/2021, filed by Plaintiff Ashley A Clement. (Mitchell, Robert) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER FOR ALL CIVIL CASES. The procedures in this Order supplement, and in some cases, supersede the local rules. The parties are responsible for being familiar with the procedures in this Order. Failure to comply with the procedures may result in sanctions. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (GC)
|
| Filing 3 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Accounts Receivable Inc, Rachel F Niten, Andrew Roskam. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(RE) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing Deficiency ***Action Required*** Jury Demand Improperly Indicated.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (RE) |
| Judge Barbara J. Rothstein added. (RE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) accounts receivable, rachel niten, andrew roskam with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-7190547) Attorney Robert W Mitchell added to party Ashley Clement(pty:pla), filed by Ashley Clement. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Accounts Receivable, #3 Summons Niten, #4 Summons Roskam)(Mitchell, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
