Valyrian IP LLC v. Infratel US Inc
Valyrian IP LLC |
Infratel US Inc |
2:2021cv01172 |
August 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Ricardo S Martinez |
Patent |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER re Parties' #15 Second Stipulated MOTION to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint. The time for Defendant Infratel US, Inc. to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff Valyrian IP LLC's Complaint is extended to 11/29/2021. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB) |
Filing 15 Second Stipulated MOTION to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint, filed by Plaintiff Valyrian IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 10/27/2021, (Mann, Philip) |
Filing 14 ORDER re Plaintiff's #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. The time for Defendant Infratel, US, Inc. to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff Valyrian IP LLC's Complaint is extended to 10/28/2021. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB) |
Filing 13 ORDER re #12 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Casey Allen Kniser for Defendant Infratel US Inc, by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS) |
Filing 12 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Casey Kniser FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant Infratel US Inc (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7296069 (Manville, Duncan) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Duncan Manville on behalf of Defendant Infratel US Inc. (Manville, Duncan) |
Filing 10 Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , filed by Plaintiff Valyrian IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 10/8/2021, (Mann, Philip) |
Filing 9 ORDER re #8 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Jimmy Chong for plaintiff Valyrian IP LLC, by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(STP) |
Filing 8 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Jimmy Chong FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Valyrian IP LLC (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7254424 (Mann, Philip) |
Filing 7 ORDER REGARDING FRCP 26(f) CONFERENCE, INITIAL DISCLOSURES, AND JOINT STATUS REPORT by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. Joint Status Report due by 10/13/2021, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 9/29/2021, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 10/6/2021. (LC) |
Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Valyrian IP LLC (Mann, Philip) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) 1-21-cv-01103 (DDE); 1-21-cv-00483 (DDE); 1-21-cv-00484 (DDE); 1-21-cv-00294 (DDE); 1-20-cv-01753 (DDE); 1-20-cv-01755 (DDE); 2-20-cv-05881 (CDCA); 2-20-cv-01315 (EDCA); 4-20-cv-00502 (EDTX); 1-20-cv-00877 (DDE); 1-20-cv-00892 (DCO); 1-20-cv-00868 (DCO); 4-20-cv-00263 (EDTX); 4-20-cv-00264 (EDTX); 4-20-cv-00266 (EDTX); 1-20-cv-00447 (DDE); 1-19-cv-01436 (DDE); 1-19-cv-01437 (DDE); 1-19-cv-01438 (DDE); 3-19-cv-01829 (NDTX), by Plaintiff Valyrian IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit (List of Related Cases))(Mann, Philip) |
Filing 4 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action. Emailed to the US Patent Office (SG) |
Filing 3 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Infratel US Inc (SG) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Complaint,. ***Action Required*** Notice of Related Cases Omitted.See attached letter for more information and instructions. Notice of Related Case must be filed by 9/7/2021. (SG) |
Judge Ricardo S. Martinez added. (SG) |
NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Plaintiff(s) must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 9/7/2021. (SG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Patent Infringement against defendant(s) Infratel US Inc with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-7229158) Attorney Philip P Mann added to party Valyrian IP LLC(pty:pla), filed by Valyrian IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Supplement List of Related Cases, #5 Summons, #6 Report on Patents and Trademarks (AO Form 120))(Mann, Philip) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Valyrian IP LLC v. Infratel US Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Valyrian IP LLC | |
Represented By: | Philip P Mann |
Represented By: | Jimmy Chong |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Infratel US Inc | |
Represented By: | Casey Allen Kniser |
Represented By: | Duncan Manville |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.