Sevarge v. Bennett et al
| William Sevarge, Jr |
| Federal Bureau of Investigation Seattle Division, USA, Daniel Eugene Bennett, Federal Bureau of Investigation and United States of America |
| 2:2021cv01265 |
| September 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| John C Coughenour |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2671 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on DEF USA on 9/30/2021, filed by Plaintiff William Sevarge, Jr. (Arin, Naomi) |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on DEF FBI, Seattle Division on 9/30/2021, filed by Plaintiff William Sevarge, Jr. (Arin, Naomi) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on DEF Daniel Bennett on 10/27/2021, filed by Plaintiff William Sevarge, Jr. (Arin, Naomi) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address/Change of Name of Attorney Naomi Arin. Filed by Plaintiff William Sevarge, Jr. (Arin, Naomi) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Naomi Arin Lawrence M Kahn on behalf of Plaintiff William Sevarge, Jr. (Kahn, Lawrence) Modified on 9/22/2021 to strike out name of appearing attorney (SR). |
| Attorney Naomi Arin added for William Sevarge, Jr; per Plaintiff's #6 Notice of Appearance. (SR) |
| NOTE: Document #6 was filed incorrectly/improperly. Appearance of attorney Lawrence M. Kahn is not proper, and notices of electronic filing will not be sent until corrected. Signatures must be in accordance with FRCP 11 and LCR 83.2(a) and must comply with #ECF Filing Procedures. (SR) Modified on 9/23/2021 to strike entry. Appearance of attorney Lawrence M. Khan is proper with the filing of the Complaint at dkt #1 . No further action is needed (SR). |
Filing 5
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (GT)
|
| Filing 4 REDACTION to #1 Complaint,, Exhibit 1 by Plaintiff William Sevarge, Jr (Kahn, Lawrence) |
| Filing 3 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Daniel Eugene Bennett, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States of America. (RE) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Complaint,. ***Action Required*** Redaction.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (RE) (Main Document 2 replaced on 9/17/2021 to modify letter for clerical error) (RE) |
| U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour added. (RE) |
| NOTICE of Docket Text Modification re #1 Complaint, : Modified text to seal Exhibit SF95 Form that includes a personal identifier. (RE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES UNDER THE FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT against defendant(s) William Sevarge, Jr Federal Bureau of Investigation Seattle Division, USA, Daniel Eugene Bennett (Receipt # AWAWDC-7251900), filed by William Sevarge, Jr. (Attachments: SEALED #1 Exhibit SF95 form, #2 Exhibit Declaration of Service of SF95 form, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Attachment to Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons)(Kahn, Lawrence) Modified on 9/15/2021 to modify parties filing is against (KB). Modified on 9/17/2021 to seal document. (RE) |
| NOTICE of Docket Text Modification re #1 Complaint: Modified docket text on 9/15/21 to indicate that filing is against defendants Federal Bureau of Investigation Seattle Division, USA, and Daniel Eugene Bennett. (KB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
