Rouise v. Williams
| Obie Rouise |
| Milton Williams |
| 2:2021cv01269 |
| September 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Thomas S Zilly |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Pursuant to the parties' Stipulated Joint Motion to Extend Deadlines, docket no. #9 , the FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is EXTENDED to 12/23/2021, the Initial Disclosure Deadline is EXTENDED to 1/5/2022, and the deadline for the parties to file a Joint Status Report is EXTENDED to 1/5/2022, (FMR) |
| Filing 9 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time , filed by Defendant Milton Williams. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 11/8/2021, (Schneider, Lea) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) re: #1 Notice of Removal by Milton Williams.(Schneider, Lea) |
| Filing 7 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant Milton Williams (Davidson, Clifford) |
| Filing 6 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal , filed by Defendant Milton Williams. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 9/21/2021, (Schneider, Lea) |
Filing 5
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Joint Status Report due by 11/22/2021, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 11/8/2021, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 11/22/2021, (FMR)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Lea K Schneider on behalf of Defendant Milton Williams. (Schneider, Lea) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Pursuant to the parties' Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer, docket no. #6 , the deadline to file an answer or other responsive pleading is EXTENDED to October 18, 2021. (FMR) |
| Filing 3 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (RE) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing Deficiency ***Action Required*** Improper Signature - Secondary Attorney(s).See attached letter for more information and instructions. (RE) |
| Judge Thomas S. Zilly added. (RE) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 21-2-08989-1; (Receipt # AWAWDC-7254279), filed by Milton Williams. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davidson, Clifford) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rouise v. Williams | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Obie Rouise | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Michael Rosfjord |
| Represented By: | Frank S. Homsher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Milton Williams | |
| Represented By: | Clifford Scott Davidson |
| Represented By: | Lea K Schneider |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
