Project Veritas v. Leland Stanford Junior University et al
Plaintiff: Project Veritas
Defendant: University of Washington and Leland Stanford Junior University
Case Number: 2:2021cv01326
Filed: September 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Thomas S Zilly
Nature of Suit: Assault Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Deadlines: Pursuant to Plaintiff's Motion to Extend, docket no. 14, the FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is EXTENDED to 1/14/2022, the Initial Disclosure Deadline is EXTENDED to 1/28/2022, the deadline for filing a Joint Status Report is EXTENDED to 1/31/2022, (FMR)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time for Initial Scheduling Deadlines, filed by Plaintiff Project Veritas. Noting Date 11/12/2021, (Ard, Joel)
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Joint Status Report due by 11/29/2021, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 11/15/2021, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 11/29/2021, (FMR)
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Plaintiff Project Veritas (Ard, Joel)
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Project Veritas (Ard, Joel)
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Leland Stanford Junior University, University of Washington (Attachments: #1 Summons)(CDA)
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Complaint,. ***Action Required*** Jury Demand Improperly Indicated.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (CDA)
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER re #5 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Andrew Clay Phillips for plaintiff Project Veritas, by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(CDA)
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER re #6 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Elizabeth Locke for plaintiff Project Veritas, by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(CDA)
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Plaintiff must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 10/7/2021. (CDA)
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Judge Thomas S. Zilly added. (CDA)
September 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Elizabeth M. Locke FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Project Veritas (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7270961 (Ard, Joel)
September 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Andrew C. Phillips FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Project Veritas (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7270936 (Ard, Joel)
September 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint, ; filed by Plaintiff Project Veritas. (Ard, Joel)
September 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PRAECIPE TO ISSUE SUMMONS on University of Washington by Plaintiff Project Veritas (Ard, Joel)
September 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PRAECIPE TO ISSUE SUMMONS on Stanford University by Plaintiff Project Veritas (Ard, Joel)
September 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-7270888) Attorney Joel B Ard added to party Project Veritas(pty:pla), filed by Project Veritas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Ard, Joel) Modified on 9/30/2021 strike jury demand, not properly requested (CDA).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Project Veritas v. Leland Stanford Junior University et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Project Veritas
Represented By: Joel B Ard
Represented By: Andrew Clay Phillips
Represented By: Elizabeth Locke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: University of Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Leland Stanford Junior University
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?