Mallard IP LLC v. Inspur Systems Inc
Plaintiff: Mallard IP LLC
Defendant: Inspur Systems, Inc. and Inspur Systems Inc
Case Number: 2:2021cv01332
Filed: September 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Barbara J Rothstein
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2021 Filing 14 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , filed by Defendant Inspur Systems Inc. Noting Date 11/23/2021, (Nelson, Tamara)
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 STANDING ORDER FOR ALL CIVIL CASES. The procedures in this Order supplement, and in some cases, supersede the local rules. The parties are responsible for being familiar with the procedures in this Order. Failure to comply with the procedures may result in sanctions. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (GC)
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting Parties' #9 Agreed Stipulated MOTION to Extend Deadline for Filing Answer by Inspur Systems, Inc.. The Court ORDERS that Defendant Inspur Systems, Inc. may have an extension of 30 days to 11/29/2021, in which to answer the Complaint for Patent Infringement. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein.(MW)
October 28, 2021 Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. Case reassigned to Judge Barbara J. Rothstein for all further proceedings. Hon. Michelle L. Peterson no longer assigned to case. (TF)
October 28, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DECLINATION OF CONSENT FORM. Each party will be deemed to have knowingly and voluntarily consented to proceed before a Magistrate Judge if this form is not returned by 11/4/2021. Please Note: Forms must not be electronically filed with the Court. (TF)
October 28, 2021 Filing 9 Agreed Stipulated MOTION to Extend Deadline for Filing Answer by Inspur Systems, Inc., filed by Defendant Inspur Systems Inc. Noting Date 10/28/2021, (Nelson, Tamara)
October 28, 2021 Filing 8 PLEASE DISREGARD - Correct motion filed at #9 Agreed Stipulated MOTION to Extend Deadline for Filing Answer by Inspur Systems, Inc., filed by Defendant Inspur Systems Inc. Noting Date 10/28/2021, (Nelson, Tamara) Modified on 10/28/2021 to strike docket entry at request of filer (KB).
October 28, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Tamara Kristine Nelson on behalf of Defendant Inspur Systems Inc. (Nelson, Tamara)
October 28, 2021 NOTICE of Docket Text Modification re #8 Agreed Stipulated MOTION to Extend Deadline for Filing Answer by Inspur Systems, Inc.: Modified on 10/28/2021 to strike docket entry and terminate motion at request of filer. Refer to #9 for correct motion.(KB)
October 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER re #4 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Cortney S. Alexander for Plaintiff Mallard IP LLC, by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS)
October 8, 2021 Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Mallard IP LLC (Mann, Philip)
October 7, 2021 Filing 4 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Cortney S. Alexander FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Mallard IP LLC (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7281724 (Mann, Philip)
October 1, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant Inspur Systems Inc. (RE)
October 1, 2021 Filing 2 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action. Emailed to the US Patent and Trademark Office. (RE)
October 1, 2021 NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Plaintiff Mallard IP LLC must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 10/8/2021. (RE)
October 1, 2021 Hon. Michelle L. Peterson added. (RE)
September 30, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Patent Infringement against defendant(s) Inspur Systems, Inc. with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-7272326) Attorney Philip P Mann added to party Mallard IP LLC(pty:pla), filed by Mallard IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Report on Patents and Trademarks (AO Form 120), #5 Summons)(Mann, Philip) (Attachments 3 and 4 replaced on 9/30/2021 to flatten malformed PDFs) (KB).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mallard IP LLC v. Inspur Systems Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mallard IP LLC
Represented By: Philip P Mann
Represented By: Cortney S. Alexander
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Inspur Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Inspur Systems Inc
Represented By: Tamara Kristine Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?