Protempo Limited et al v. GAEMS Inc et al
| Protempo Limited and Protempo US Limited |
| G.A.E.M.S. INC., DWG Holding Company LLC, Does 1-20 and GAEMS Inc |
| 2:2021cv01337 |
| September 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| James L Robart |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Benjamin Alexander Ellison on behalf of Defendant DWG Holding Company LLC. (Ellison, Benjamin) |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on DWG Holding Company, LLC on 10/19/2021, filed by Plaintiffs Protempo Limited, Protempo US Limited. (Swanson, Paul) |
Filing 8
ORDER re #3 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Kathryn Domin for Plaintiffs Protempo Limited and Protempo US Limited, by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS)
|
| NOTICE of Docket Text Modification re #4 Corporate Disclosure Statement, added additional corporate parent/affiliate information. (RE) |
| Filing 7 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) DWG Holding Company LLC, GAEMS Inc. (RE) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER re #2 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Roger F Friedman for Plaintiffs Protempo Limited and Protempo US Limited, by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS)
|
| Judge James L. Robart added. (RE) |
| Filing 5 PRAECIPE TO ISSUE SUMMONS re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiffs Protempo Limited, Protempo US Limited (Swanson, Paul) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating Plaintiffs Protempo Limited, a New Zealand corporation (Protempo NZ) and Protempo US Limited, a Delaware corporation (Protempo US). Protempo NZ is a privately held company with no parent company. No publicly held corporation owns ten percent (10%) or more of Protempo NZs stock. Protempo US is a privately held company. Protempo US is 100% owned by Protempo NZ . Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Protempo Limited, Protempo US Limited (Swanson, Paul) Modified on 10/4/2021 to add parent/affiliate information. (RE) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Kathryn D.Z. Domin FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiffs Protempo Limited, Protempo US Limited (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7272931 (Swanson, Paul) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Roger F. Friedman FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiffs Protempo Limited, Protempo US Limited (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7272911 (Swanson, Paul) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF against All Defendants (Receipt # AWAWDC-7272653), filed by Protempo Limited, Protempo US Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B1, #3 Exhibit B2, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Swanson, Paul) (Attachment 4 replaced to flatten malformed PDF on 9/30/2021) (STP). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
