Wierzchos v. Mendez et al
Plaintiff: Diana Wierzchos
Defendant: Anthony Mendez and Swarovski
Case Number: 2:2021cv01430
Filed: October 18, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Robert S Lasnik
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the above-captioned matter should not be dismissed for improper venue under 28 U.S.C. 1406(a). Plaintiff shall file her response on or before 12/8/2021. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (LH) (cc: Plaintiff via US mail)
November 17, 2021 re #9 Order to Show Cause NOTED on motion calendar for 12/10/2021. (LH)
November 8, 2021 Filing 8 Mail addressed to Diana Wierzchos returned as Undeliverable re #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (LH) (Mail was returned from Plaintiff's Silver Springs Blvd. address. Copy of Dkt. #4 has been mailed to Plaintiff's updated address on 11/5/2021)
November 1, 2021 Filing 7 Mail addressed to Diana Wierzchos returned as Undeliverable re #2 Case/IFP Deficiency Letter. (LH)
October 26, 2021 Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff Diana Wierzchos. Noted by Clerk for 11/12/2021. (LH)
October 26, 2021 Filing 5 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Receipt # IFP granted), filed by Diana Wierzchos.(LH)
October 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting Plaintiff's #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Hon. S. Kate Vaughan. (LH) (cc: Plaintiff via US mail) Modified on 10/26/2021 to indicate a copy of dkt. #2 is enclosed, clarifying that complaint signature page is still needed and still due 11/2/2021. Blank pro se complaint signature page also enclosed. (LH).
October 25, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Diana Wierzchos. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Motion for Counsel) (LH)
October 19, 2021 Filing 2 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Proposed Document(s). ***Action Required*** Filing Fee Not Paid, Improper Signature.See attached letter for more information and instructions.Corrected signature page must be filed by 11/2/2021. Filer has until 11/18/2021 to correct IFP application (CDA)cc plaintiff via US Mail
October 18, 2021 Filing 1 PROPOSED Complaint filed by Plaintiff Diana Wierzchos (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Email transmittal)(CDA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wierzchos v. Mendez et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diana Wierzchos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anthony Mendez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Swarovski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?