Shu v. Ma et al
Plaintiff: Wenling Shu
Defendant: Dong Ma and Su Bing
Case Number: 2:2021cv01432
Filed: October 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: John C Coughenour
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Su Bing, Dong Ma.(Clapham, Linda)
December 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER re Defendants' #9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint. Defendants shall file their answer, or responsive pleading, by 12/10/2021. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (SR)
December 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 REPLY, filed by Defendants Su Bing, Dong Ma, TO RESPONSE to #9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint (Clapham, Linda)
December 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 DECLARATION of Wenling Shu filed by Plaintiff Wenling Shu re #9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint (Oster, Thomas)
December 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 RESPONSE, by Plaintiff Wenling Shu, to #9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint. (Oster, Thomas)
November 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ENTRY SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT DATES All counsel and any pro se parties are directed to meet and confer and to provide the Court with a combined Joint Status Report (the Report) by the deadline set below. This meet-and-confer must be a face-to-face meeting or a telephonic conference. If the parties are unable to agree on any part of the Report, they may answer in separate paragraphs; no separate reports are to be filed. The Report must contain the following information: 1. An estimate of the number of days needed for trial; 2. The date by which the case will be ready for trial; and 3. Whether the parties intend to mediate per LCR 39.1 and, if so, when the parties expect to complete mediation.The deadlines below may be extended only by court order. Any request for extension of these deadlines should be made by email to Courtroom Deputy Clerk Gabriel Traber at gabriel_traber@wawd.uscourts.gov. The parties who have appeared in this matter must meet and confer before contacting the Court to request an extension. If this case involves claims that are exempt from the requirements of FRCP 26(a) and 26(f), please notify the Courtroom Deputy Clerk. Please note: Initial Disclosures are not to be filed. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 3/4/2022, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 3/11/2022, Joint Status Report due by 3/18/2022. (GT)
November 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint, filed by Defendants Su Bing, Dong Ma. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 12/3/2021, (Clapham, Linda)
November 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Scott Roberts Weaver on behalf of Defendants Su Bing, Dong Ma. (Weaver, Scott)
November 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Linda Blohm Clapham on behalf of Defendants Su Bing, Dong Ma. (Clapham, Linda)
November 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Dong Ma on 11/8/2021, filed by Plaintiff Wenling Shu. (Oster, Thomas)
November 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Su Bing on 11/8/2021, filed by Plaintiff Wenling Shu. (Oster, Thomas)
October 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (GT)
October 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Su Bing, Dong Ma. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(RE)
October 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of Filing Deficiency ***Action Required*** Improper Signature - Secondary Attorney(s).See attached letter for more information and instructions. (RE)
October 21, 2021 Opinion or Order U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour added. (RE)
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Su Bing, Dong Ma (Receipt # AWAWDC-7299626) Attorney Thomas Oster added to party Wenling Shu(pty:pla), filed by Wenling Shu. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Summons, #8 Summons)(Oster, Thomas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shu v. Ma et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wenling Shu
Represented By: Thomas Oster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dong Ma
Represented By: Linda Blohm Clapham
Represented By: Scott Roberts Weaver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Su Bing
Represented By: Linda Blohm Clapham
Represented By: Scott Roberts Weaver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?