Campbell v. XR Foods
Plaintiff: Antonio L Campbell
Defendant: XR Foods doing business as Burger King
Case Number: 2:2021cv01436
Filed: October 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Robert S Lasnik
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2021 Filing 13 Mail addressed to Antonio Campbell returned as Undeliverable re #12 Order to Show Cause. (LH)
November 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The Clerk of Court is directed to note a "Rule 41 dismissal proceeding" on the calendar for 1/21/2022. If plaintiff fails to notify the Court and opposing parties of his current address by that date, the Court will dismiss the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Local Civil Rule 41(b)(2). Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (LH) (cc: Plaintiff via US mail)
November 12, 2021 Filing 11 Mail addressed to Antonio L Campbell returned as Undeliverable re #8 Judge Assignment Letter (Transfer case). (RE)
November 12, 2021 Filing 10 Mail addressed to Antonio L Campbell returned as Undeliverable re #9 Case/IFP Deficiency Letter. (RE)
October 25, 2021 Filing 9 Notice of Filing Deficiency ***Action Required*** Incorrect IFP Submitted.See attached letter for more information and instructions. Filer has until 11/24/2021 to correct IFP application (Sent via USPS) (RE)
October 20, 2021 Filing 8 LETTER from Clerk to to parties re receipt of case from District of Southern District of New York and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (RE) (Letter and IFP Application sent via USPS)
October 20, 2021 Filing 7 Case transferred in from District of New York Southern, Case Number 1:21-cv-06742.
October 20, 2021 Judge Robert S. Lasnik added. (RE)
October 20, 2021 ***Motion terminated: #1 filed by Antonio L. Campbell. (RE)
October 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 TRANSFER ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Whether Plaintiff should be permitted to proceed further without prepayment of fees is a determination to be made by the transferee court. A summons shall not issue from this Court. This order closes this case. The Court certifies, under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is further directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 10/8/21) (rdz) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing. [Transferred from nysd on 10/20/2021.]
October 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: On September 21, 2021, the Court issued an order erroneously transferring this action to the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. (ECF 4.) The Court therefore vacates that order and directs the Clerk of Court to reopen this action for further proceedings. The Clerk of Court is further directed to strike ECF 4 from the docket and to delete the entire entry. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 10/7/21) (rdz) [Transferred from nysd on 10/20/2021.]
October 7, 2021 ***STRICKEN DOCUMENT. Deleted document number 4 from the case record. The document was stricken from this case pursuant to #5 Order Striking Document from Record,. (rdz) [Transferred from nysd on 10/20/2021.]
September 22, 2021 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(bcu) [Transferred from nysd on 10/20/2021.]
August 10, 2021 Filing 3 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Antonio Campbell consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Antonio L. Campbell.(rdz) (Main Document 3 replaced on 8/12/2021) (rdz). [Transferred from nysd on 10/20/2021.]
August 10, 2021 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against XR Foods. Document filed by Antonio L. Campbell.(rdz) [Transferred from nysd on 10/20/2021.] (Main Document 2 replaced on 10/25/2021) (KB). (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/25/2021: #1 EEOC Form 5) (KB). Modified on 10/25/2021 to seal document 2-1 - Document contains personal identifiers. Document sealed pursuant to LCR 5.2. (KB).
August 10, 2021 Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Anonio L. Campbell.(rdz) [Transferred from nysd on 10/20/2021.]
August 10, 2021 Case Designated ECF. (rdz) [Transferred from nysd on 10/20/2021.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Campbell v. XR Foods
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antonio L Campbell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: XR Foods doing business as Burger King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?