Bogicevic v. Seabourn Cruise Line Limited
Nikola Bogicevic |
Seabourn Cruise Line Limited |
2:2021cv01573 |
November 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
James L Robart |
Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER granting Defendant's #4 Motion to Compel Arbitration, in accordance with the terms of Mr. Bogicevic's Employment Agreement and the CBA. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to administratively close this case. Either party may move to reopen this matter for good cause shown. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (LH) |
Filing 9 REPLY, filed by Defendant Seabourn Cruise Line Limited, TO RESPONSE to #4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration (Maltzman, Jeffrey) |
Filing 8 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT by Judge James L. Robart. Joint Status Report due by 2/9/2022, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 1/19/2022, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 2/2/2022. (AD) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE, by Plaintiff Nikola Bogicevic, to #4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration. (Margulies, Jason) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Jeffrey B. Maltzman on behalf of Defendant Seabourn Cruise Line Limited. (Maltzman, Jeffrey) |
NOTE: Document #4 was filed incorrectly/improperly. Appearance of attorney Jeffrey B. Maltzman is not proper, and notices of electronic filing will not be sent until corrected. Signatures must be in accordance with FRCP 11 and LCR 83.2(a) and must comply with #ECF Filing Procedures. (LH) |
Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. Case reassigned to Judge James L. Robart for all further proceedings. Hon. Michelle L. Peterson no longer assigned to case. (TF) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration, filed by Defendant Seabourn Cruise Line Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Proposed Order)(Maltzman, Jeffrey) |
Noting Date Set re #4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration : Noting Date 1/7/2022. (TF) |
Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Seabourn Cruise Line Limited on 11/23/2021, filed by Plaintiff Nikola Bogicevic. (Margulies, Jason) |
Filing 2 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant Seabourn Cruise Line Limited. (RE) |
Hon. Michelle L. Peterson added. (EG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Nikola Bogicevic with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-7341842) Attorney Jason R Margulies added to party Nikola Bogicevic(pty:pla), filed by Nikola Bogicevic. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Margulies, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bogicevic v. Seabourn Cruise Line Limited | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Nikola Bogicevic | |
Represented By: | Jason R Margulies |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Seabourn Cruise Line Limited | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey B. Maltzman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.