Panopto Inc v. Vitek-IP LLC et al
Panopto Inc |
Vitek-IP LLC, John Forrester, Sam Wilson, Smith Tim and Tim Smith |
2:2021cv01649 |
December 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
J Richard Creatura |
Patent |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time for Defendants to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint (Ex Parte), filed by Plaintiff Panopto Inc. Noting Date 2/4/2022, (Chung, Jennifer) |
Filing 11 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Jean-Paul Ciardullo FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Panopto Inc (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7393028 (Byer, Benjamin) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 MOTION Extending Time to Respond to Complaint, signed by Judge J Richard Creatura. (KAM) |
Filing 9 Ex Parte MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint, filed by Plaintiff Panopto Inc. Noting Date 12/30/2021, (Chung, Jennifer) Modified on 1/3/2022 (AMD). |
Filing 8 ORDER re #3 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney William J Robinson for Plaintiff Panopto Inc, by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS) |
Filing 7 ORDER re #4 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Justin M Sobaje for Plaintiff Panopto Inc, by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS) |
Filing 6 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action. Emailed to the US Patent Office. (ST) |
Filing 5 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) John Forrester, Smith Tim, Vitek-IP LLC, Sam Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(ST) |
Judge J Richard Creatura added. (ST) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Justin M. Sobaje FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Panopto Inc (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7363674 (Byer, Benjamin) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY William J. Robinson FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Panopto Inc (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7363662 (Byer, Benjamin) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Panopto Midco, LLC, Corporate Parent Panopto Intermediate Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent Panopto Holdings, LLC for Panopto Inc. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Panopto Inc (Byer, Benjamin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Judicial Declaration of Patent Invalidity and Noninfringement of US Patent Nos. 8,750,843, 8,150,386 and 9,245,295 against All Defendants Attorney Benjamin J Byer added to party Panopto Inc(pty:pla), filed by Panopto Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Report on Patents and Trademarks (AO Form 120), #3 Summons to Tim Smith, #4 Summons to Sam Wilson, #5 Summons to John Forrester, #6 Summons to Vitek-IP LLC)(Byer, Benjamin) (Prepayment Waived) |
Civil Filing Fee payment by attorney Benjamin J Byer on behalf of Plaintiff Panopto Inc re #1 Complaint,. $402.00 receipt number AWAWDC-7362880 (Byer, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.