Ellison v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company
| Tiffany Ellison |
| Progressive Direct Insurance Company |
| 2:2021cv01691 |
| December 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER granting Parties' #11 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss. This case shall be dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or fees to any party. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)
|
| Filing 11 Stipulated MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Defendant Progressive Direct Insurance Company. Noting Date 10/25/2022, (Lether, Thomas) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting Parties' #9 Stipulated MOTION to Extend Deadlines. Disclosure of Expert Testimony due by 12/5/2022, Motions Related to Discovery due by 12/5/2022. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)
|
| Filing 9 Stipulated MOTION to Extend Deadlines, filed by Defendant Progressive Direct Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 9/8/2022, (Lether, Thomas) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE AND RELATED DATES by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. Jury Trial is set for 4/3/2023 at 09:00 AM before Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. Length of Trial: *5 days*.Joinder of Parties due by 4/4/2022, Amended Pleadings due by 4/4/2022, Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 10/5/2022, Motions due by 11/4/2022, Discovery completed by 12/5/2022, Dispositive motions due by 1/3/2023, 39.1 mediation to be completed by 2/17/2023, Motions in Limine due by 3/6/2023, Pretrial Order due by 3/22/2023, Trial briefs to be submitted by 3/29/2023, Proposed voir dire/jury instructions due by 3/29/2023. (LC)
|
| Filing 7 JOINT STATUS REPORT signed by all parties. Estimated Trial Days: 5. (Neal, Eric) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. Joint Status Report due by 2/22/2022, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 2/7/2022, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 2/14/2022. (LC)
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) re: #1 Notice of Removal, and Affirmative Defenses by Progressive Direct Insurance Company.(Neal, Eric) |
| Filing 4 LETTER from Clerk to re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (ST) |
| Judge Ricardo S. Martinez added. (ST) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent The Progressive Corporation, Corporate Parent Progressive Direct Holdings, Inc. for Progressive Direct Insurance Company. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Progressive Direct Insurance Company (Lether, Thomas) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Cindy Johnson re #1 Notice of Removal, by Defendant Progressive Direct Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Lether, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 21-2-15892-3 SEA; (Receipt # AWAWDC-7379097) Attorney Thomas Lether added to party Progressive Direct Insurance Company(pty:dft), filed by Progressive Direct Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8)(Lether, Thomas) (ST). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
