Ace Relocation Systems Inc v. Ace Relocation Service
| Ace Relocation Systems, Inc. and Ace Relocation Systems Inc |
| Ace Relocation Service |
| 2:2022cv00096 |
| January 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| David W Christel |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Ace Relocation Systems Inc (Serko, Alice) |
| Filing 4 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action. Emailed to the US Patent Office. (ST) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Complaint,. ***Action Required*** Copyright/Patent/Trademark Forms Omitted.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (ST) |
| Filing 2 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Ace Relocation Service. (ST) |
| NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Plaintiff(s) must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 2/8/2022. (ST) |
| Judge David W. Christel added. (ST) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Receipt # AWAWDC-7420537), filed by Ace Relocation Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - U.S. Reg. No. 5,901,539 Registration, #2 Exhibit B - U.S. Reg. No. 3,511,613 Registration, #3 Exhibit C - Letter, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons)(Serko, Alice) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
