Bowman v. Andrewjeski
Petitioner: Thomasdinh Newsome Bowman
Respondent: Melissa Andrewjeski
Case Number: 2:2022cv00316
Filed: March 15, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: J Richard Creatura
Referring Judge: David G Estudillo
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Holger Sonntag on behalf of Respondent Melissa Andrewjeski. (Sonntag, Holger)
April 22, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE OF OPTION TO CONSENT TO US MAGISTRATE JUDGE. To consent to a US Magistrate Judge, return the executed form by 5/23/2022. Please Note: Forms must not be electronically filed with the Court. (AMD)
April 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER FOR SERVICE AND ANSWER, 2254 PETITION by email upon the Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Washington, signed by Judge J Richard Creatura. ( #4 Petition, #6 Praecipe, this Order and Notice of Option to Consent emailed 4/22/2022) (AMD)
April 19, 2022 Filing 6 PRAECIPE to attach document (Verification of Petitioner) re #4 Amended Petition by Petitioner Thomasdinh Newsome Bowman (Saunders, Jason)
April 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DECLINING TO SERVE 2254 PETITION re #4 Amended Petition filed by Thomasdinh Newsome Bowman. The signature page or verification shall be filed not later than twenty (20) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge J Richard Creatura. (AMD)
April 11, 2022 Filing 4 AMENDED PETITION , filed by Thomasdinh Newsome Bowman.(Saunders, Jason)
March 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO FILE AMENDED PETITION: Petitioner shall file an amended petition on the Court's form (or substantially following the form) on or before 4/11/2022. Signed by Judge J Richard Creatura. (AMD)
March 24, 2022 Filing 2 PRAECIPE to attach document (Verification of Petitioner) re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Petitioner Thomasdinh Newsome Bowman (Saunders, Jason)
March 16, 2022 U.S. District Judge David G. Estudillo and Judge J Richard Creatura added. (ST)
March 15, 2022 Filing 1 2254 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Receipt # AWAWDC-7475673), filed by Thomasdinh Newsome Bowman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Saunders, Jason) (Main Document 1 replaced on 3/16/2022) (ST). (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/16/2022: #2 Exhibit) (ST) Modified on 3/16/2022. Petition and exhibits originally filed as one document. Clerk separated and re-posted both documents individually. (ST) (Attachment 1 replaced on 3/21/2022 to flatten malformed PDF) (KB).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bowman v. Andrewjeski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Thomasdinh Newsome Bowman
Represented By: Jason B Saunders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Melissa Andrewjeski
Represented By: Holger Sonntag
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?