Burnett v. United States of America
| Kenneth R Burnett |
| United States of America |
| 2:2022cv00361 |
| March 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| James L Robart |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting Petitioner's #8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Petitioner's deadline to file a response is now 6/13/2022. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (LH)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to file Response, filed by Petitioner Kenneth R Burnett. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 5/16/2022, (Cantor, Jesse) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting Respondent's #6 Stipulated MOTION. The government's response to Burnett's Motion is now due May 27, 2022. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (LH)
|
| Filing 6 Stipulated MOTION Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Answer Burnetts Motion to Vacate Judgment Under 28 U.S.C. 2255, filed by Respondent United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 5/13/2022, (Becker, Erin) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE AND ANSWER. Documents served electronically to United States of America on 3/31/2021. United States' Answer due within 45 days of service and shall be noted for the fourth Friday after is it filed. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (LH)
|
| Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT re #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255), VERIFICATION UNDER LCR 100(e) IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2255 by Petitioner Kenneth R Burnett (Cantor, Jesse) |
|
Filing 3
MINUTE ORDER. The court DIRECTS counsel to supplement Mr. Burnett's 2255 motion with a verification statement in accordance with the local rules. Authorized by Judge James L. Robart. (SB)
|
| Judge James L. Robart added. (ST) |
| Filing 1 2255 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence, filed by Kenneth R Burnett. Related to criminal case: 17-cr-029-JLR. (Attachments: #1 Snohomish County Superior Court Order Vacating Conviction, #2 Sentencing Transcript Excerpt)(Lai, Vicki) Modified on 3/29/2022 to add name of court to description of attachment 1. (ST) (Main Document 1 replaced on 3/29/2022. Criminal case number removed from case caption.) (ST) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Burnett v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Kenneth R Burnett | |
| Represented By: | Jesse Guerrero Cantor |
| Represented By: | Vicki W. W. Lai |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | US Attorney Habeas |
| Represented By: | Erin Becker |
| Represented By: | Teal Luthy Miller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
