Private Client Fiduciary Corporation et al v. Chopra et al
Joginder Chopra and Private Client Fiduciary Corporation |
Pham Singh Chopra, Akal Institute and Jane Doe Chopra |
2:2022cv00436 |
April 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Lauren King |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, filed by Respondent Pham Singh Chopra. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 6/24/2022, (DeMonte, Theresa) |
Filing 14 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 6/23/2022, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 7/7/2022, Joint Status Report due by 7/21/2022. Signed by Judge Lauren King. (NAW) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Brent W Beecher on behalf of Respondent Akal Institute. (Beecher, Brent) |
Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER (text only) granting #11 Stipulated MOTION for Extension to Answer Complaint. Pham Singh Chopra's deadline to file an answer is extended to 5/31/2022. Authorized by Judge Lauren King. (NAW) |
Filing 11 Stipulated MOTION for Extension to Answer Complaint, filed by Respondent Pham Singh Chopra. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 5/13/2022, (DeMonte, Theresa) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Theresa M DeMonte on behalf of Respondent Pham Singh Chopra. (DeMonte, Theresa) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with JURY DEMAND by Akal Institute.(Gewald, Anthony) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Anthony J. W. Gewald on behalf of Respondent Akal Institute. (Gewald, Anthony) |
Attorneys Avi J. Lipman and Ai-Li Anna Chiong-Martinson added for Pham Singh Chopra; per #10 Notice of Appearance. (SR) |
Filing 7 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Akal Institute, Jane Doe Chopra, Pham Singh Chopra (MW) |
Filing 6 PRAECIPE TO ISSUE SUMMONS re #1 Complaint, For Damages by Petitioner Joginder Chopra (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Spitzer, Amy) |
Filing 5 STANDING ORDER FOR ALL CIVIL CASES. The procedures in this Order supplement, and in some cases, supersede the local rules. The parties are responsible for being familiar with the procedures in this Order. Failure to comply with the procedures may result in sanctions. Signed by Judge Lauren King. (NAW) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER REGARDING 28 U.S.C. 455(b)(2) AND CANON 3(C)(1)(B) OF THE CODE OF CONDUCT FOR UNITED STATES JUDGES by Judge Lauren King. (NAW) (Main Document 4 replaced on 5/5/2022) (NAW). |
Filing 3 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Complaint. ***Action Required*** Redaction.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (MJV) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Complaint. ***Action Required*** Civil Cover Sheet Omitted.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (MJV) |
Judge Lauren King added. (MJV) |
NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Plaintiff(s) must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 4/13/2022. (MJV) |
Filing 1 SEALED DOCUMENT COMPLAINT For Damages against defendant(s) All Respondents All Plaintiffs (Receipt # AWAWDC-7501667), filed by Joginder Chopra, Private Client Fiduciary Corporation. (Spitzer, Amy) Modified on 4/6/2022 to seal document due to personal identifiers. Modified on 4/6/2022 to correct party role to Respondents. (MJV) Modified on 4/11/2022 to add additional filer (KB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.