Demos v. United States of America et al
| John Robert Demos, Jr |
| United States, US International Trade Commission, Federal Trade Commission and United States of America |
| 2:2022cv00487 |
| April 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| David W Christel |
| Lauren King |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER ADOPTING #2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, by Judge Lauren King. Plaintiff's #1 Proposed Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. **1 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(John Demos, Prisoner ID: 28455)(ST)
|
| Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Proposed Document(s) filed by John Robert Demos, Jr. The Parties shall have fourteen (14) days from service of this Report to file written objections. This matter is set for consideration on Date 5/13/2022. Signed by Judge David W. Christel. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Judgment)**4 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(John Demos, Prisoner ID: 28455)(AMD) |
| Filing 1 PROPOSED 1983 Civil Rights Complaint filed by Plaintiff John Robert Demos, Jr. (No IFP or Filing Fee Received) (AMD) **4 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY**(John Demos, Prisoner ID: 287455) Modified on 4/18/2022 to add prisoner info(AMD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
