Russell v. WADOT Capital Inc et al
| Petra Russell |
| WADOT Capital, Inc., Erik Egger, Nicole House, Michael White, Steven White, HMJOINT, LLC, Michele Chaffee, Lisa Hallmon, NCW Trustee Services, LLC, Todd Lindstrom Corporation d/b/a Capital Compete, Todd Lindstrom, Tia Lindstrom, WADOT Capital Inc, HMJOINT LLC, NCW Trustee Services LLC, Todd Lindstrom Corporation a Washington Corporation doing business as Capital Compete, Todd Lindstrom as Todd Lindstrom Corporation governing person doing business as Capital Compete, Jane Doe Lindstrom as Todd Lindstrom Corporation governing person doing business as Capital Compete and John Does 1-10 |
| 2:2022cv00531 |
| April 20, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| James L Robart |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER denying Plaintiff's #9 Motion to Remand. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (LH)
|
Filing 16
REPLY, filed by Plaintiff Petra Russell, TO RESPONSE to #9 MOTION to Remand to the King County Superior Court (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Reply Declaration of Boris Davidovskiy)(Davidovskiy, Boris)
|
Filing 15
DECLARATION of Todd Lindstrom filed by Defendants Todd Lindstrom, Todd Lindstrom Corporation re #9 MOTION to Remand to the King County Superior Court (Krattli, Darren)
|
Filing 14
RESPONSE, by Defendants Todd Lindstrom, Todd Lindstrom Corporation, to #9 MOTION to Remand to the King County Superior Court. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Krattli, Darren)
|
Filing 13
Joinder in RESPONSE, by Defendants Michele Chaffee, Erik Egger, Lisa Hallmon, Nicole House, WADOT Capital Inc, Michael White, Steven White, to #9 MOTION to Remand to the King County Superior Court. (Linde, Thomas) Modified title on 5/31/2022 (LH).
|
Filing 12
RESPONSE, by Defendant HMJOINT LLC, to #9 MOTION to Remand to the King County Superior Court. (Linde, Thomas)
|
Filing 11
STIPULATION AND ORDER re Parties' #10 Stipulated MOTION and [Proposed] Order to Extend Deadlines. The Court ORDERS that the deadlines for the FRCP 26(f) conference, initial disclosure deadline, and joint status report be reset by sixty (60) days. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (LH)
|
Filing 10
Stipulated MOTION and [Proposed] Order to Extend Deadlines, filed by Plaintiff Petra Russell. Noting Date 5/17/2022, (Davidovskiy, Boris)
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Remand to the King County Superior Court, filed by Plaintiff Petra Russell. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 6/3/2022, (Davidovskiy, Boris)
|
Filing 8
DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Plaintiff Petra Russell (Davidovskiy, Boris)
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Unavailability of counsel Boris Davidovskiy for Plaintiff Petra Russell from 6/24/22-7/8/22. (Davidovskiy, Boris)
|
Filing 6
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by WADOT Capital Inc (Linde, Thomas)
|
Filing 5
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by HMJOINT LLC (Linde, Thomas)
|
Filing 4
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT by Judge James L. Robart. Joint Status Report due by 6/8/2022, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 5/18/2022, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 6/1/2022. (AD)
|
Filing 3
VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS by Defendant HMJOINT LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2-Order Setting Case Schedule, #3 Exhibit 3-Case Information Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit 4-Summons, #5 Exhibit 5- Lis Pendens, #6 Exhibit 6- Notice re Dependent of Person of Military Service, #7 Exhibit 7 - Note for Motion, #8 Exhibit 8-Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, #9 Exhibit 9-Affidavit of Service, #10 Exhibit 10- Notice of Appearance, #11 Exhibit 11- Declaration, #12 Exhibit 12- Affidavit Declaration of Service, #13 Exhibit 13-Objection to Restraining Order, #14 Exhibit 14-Declaration of Egger, #15 Exhibit 15-Declaration of John McIntosh, #16 Exhibit 16-Affidavit Declaration of Service, #17 Exhibit 17- Notice of Appearance, #18 Exhibit 18-Affidavit Declaration of Service, #19 Exhibit 19-Note for Motion, #20 Exhibit 20-Affidavit Declaration of Service, #21 Exhibit 21- Notice of Association, #22 Exhibit 22- Affidavit Declaration of Service, #23 Exhibit 23-Affidavit Declaration of Service, #24 Exhibit 24- Affidavit Declaration of Service, #25 Exhibit 25- Affidavit Declaration of Service, #26 Exhibit 26- Reply, #27 Exhibit 27-Declration of Petra Russell, #28 Exhibit 28-Affdavit Declaration of Service, #29 Exhibit 29-Declaration of Boris Davidovskiy, #30 Exhibit 30-Declaration of R. Lowell, #31 Exhibit 31- Declaration of Petra Russell, #32 Exhibit 32-Affidavit Declaration, #33 Exhibit 33- Temporary Restraining Order, #34 Exhibit 34- Minutes Motion Hearing, #35 Exhibit 35- Notice of Hearing, #36 Exhibit 36-Memorandum of Authorities, #37 Exhibit 37- Declaration of Davidovskiy, #38 Exhibit 38- Declaration in Support of Preliminary Injunction, #39 Exhibit 39- Declaration of Randall Lowell in Support, #40 Exhibit 40-Affiadavit Declaration of Service, #41 Exhibit 41- Second Declaration of Eric Egger, #42 Exhibit 42- Second Declaration of John McIntosh, #43 Exhibit 43-Response, #44 Exhibit 44- Affidavit Declaration of Service, #45 Exhibit 45- Amended Summons, #46 Exhibit 47-Affidavit Declaration of Service, #47 Exhibit 48- Reply in Support, #48 Exhibit 49-Declaration in Support of Preliminary Injunction, #49 Exhibit 50-Affidavit Declaration of Service, #50 Exhibit 51-Notice of Supplemental Authority, #51 Exhibit 52-Affidavit Declaration of Service, #52 Exhibit 53- Minutes Motion Hearing, #53 Exhibit 54-Answer and Affirmative Defenses, #54 Exhibit 55-Affidavit Declaration of Service, #55 Exhibit 56-Order for Preliminary Injunction, #56 Exhibit 57- Motion for Reconsideration, #57 Exhibit 58- Notice of Hearing, #58 Exhibit 59- Affidavit Declaration of Service, #59 Exhibit 60- Notice Hearing, #60 Exhibit 61- Affidavit Declaration of Service, #61 Exhibit 62- Motion for Default, #62 Exhibit 63-Notice of Hearing, #63 Exhibit 64-Affidavit Declaration of Service, #64 Exhibit 65- Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration, #65 Exhibit 66-Answer and Affirmative Defenses, #66 Exhibit 67- Certificate of Service, #67 Exhibit 68-Notice to Strike, #68 Exhibit 69-Certificate of Service, #69 Exhibit 70- Notice of Appearance, #70 Exhibit 71- Certificate of Service, #71 Exhibit 72- Notice of Appearance, #72 Exhibit 73- Certificate of Service, #73 Exhibit 74- Notice of Removal, #74 Exhibit 75-Certificate of Service)(Linde, Thomas)
|
Filing 2
LETTER from Clerk to re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (JWC)
|
DISREGARD Judge Thomas S. Zilly added. Modified on 4/22/2022 (JWC).
|
NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, HMJOINT LLC must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 4/29/2022. (CDA)
|
NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Defendants WADOT Capital Inc, NCW Trustee Services LLC, and Todd Lindstrom Corporation must file Corporate Disclosure Statements by 4/29/2022. (JWC)
|
Judge James L. Robart added. (JWC)
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 22-2-01554-3SEA; (Receipt # AWAWDC-7523358), filed by HMJOINT, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Certificate of Service)(Linde, Thomas)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.