Chang v. Vanderwielen et al
Vicki Chang |
Andrew Vanderwielen, Brian Hunt, Jane Gurevich, John Doe Security Guard #1, Edward Collins, Tyler Redding, Kathleen Flaherty, Riddhi Kothari, City of Seattle and John Doe |
2:2022cv00657 |
May 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
John H Chun |
John C Coughenour |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER denying Plaintiff's #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The instant allegations are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice to reasserting them in another unpaid complaint. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (SR) (cc: Plaintiff via U.S. mail) |
Case Reassigned to U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour as related to C22-013JCC. Judge John H. Chun no longer assigned to the case. (AD) cc: Plaintiff via US mail |
Filing 3 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) (JWC) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Vicki Chang. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 PROPOSED Application for Court-Appointed Counsel) Case assignment sheet given to Plaintiff at intake window (JWC) Modified on 5/17/2022 add proposed language to text (CDA). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.